Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Atomic number and isotopy before nuclear structure

Multiple standards and evolving collaboration of chemistry and physics

Bibliographic Data

ID21702173
AuthorsJordi Cat (0000-0001-5124-7909, Indiana University Bloomington, corresponding author), Nicholas W Best (0000-0001-8469-0819, Western Sydney University)
Year2023
Volume25
Issue1
Pages67-99
Publication date2023-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFoundations of Chemistry (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1386-4238 • E-ISSN: 1572-8463
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10698-022-09450-x
OpenAlexW4311622322
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited58

We provide a detailed history of the concepts of atomic number and isotopy before the discovery of protons and neutrons that draws attention to the role of evolving interplays of multiple aims and criteria in chemical and physical research. Focusing on research by Frederick Soddy and Ernest Rutherford, we show that, in the context of differentiating disciplinary projects, the adoption of a complex and shifting concept of elemental identity and the ordering role of the periodic table led to a relatively coherent notion of atomic number. Subsequent attention to valency, still neglected in the secondary literature, and to nuclear charge led to a decoupling of the concepts of elemental identity and weight and allowed for a coherent concept of isotopy. This concept received motivation from empirical investigations on the decomposition series of radioelements and their unstable chemical identity. A new model of chemical order was the result of an ongoing collaboration between chemical and physical research projects with evolving aims and standards. After key concepts were considered resolved and their territories were clarified, chemistry and physics resumed autonomous projects, yet remained bound by newly accepted explanatory relations. It is an episode of scientific collaboration and partial integration without simple, wholesale gestalt switches or chemical revolutions

Biology · Epistemology · Physics · Chemistry · History and advancements in chemistry · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Twentieth Century Scientific Developments · Paleontology

  • Response to the critique by Dr. K. Brad Wray, published in foundations of chemistry October 6, 2022

    Open Access•Gareth R Eaton•Foundations of Chemistry•2023

  • What happened when chemists came to classify elements by their atomic number

    Open Access•K Brad Wray•Foundations of Chemistry•2022

  • ‘Modernists with a Vengeance’

    Open Access•Jeff Hughes•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1998

  • Conceptual Changes in Chemistry

    Open Access•Helge Kragh•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2000

  • The value of vague ideas in the development of the periodic system of chemical elements

    Open Access•Tobias Vogt•Synthese•2021

  • The Epistemological Status of the Chemical Concept of Element (Ii)

    F A PANETH•The British Journal for the…•1962

  • The Suicidal Success of Radiochemistry

    Open Access•Lawrence Badash•The British Journal for the…•1979

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae