Why we have duties of autonomy towards marginal agents
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21702390 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anna Hirsch (0000-0002-2115-918X, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 453-475 |
| Publication date | 2023-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Metamedicine (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0166-2031 • E-ISSN: 1573-1200 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11017-023-09623-5 |
| PMID | 37171523 |
| OpenAlex | W4376224743 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 61 |
Patients are usually granted autonomy rights, including the right to consent to or refuse treatment. These rights are commonly attributed to patients if they fulfil certain conditions. For example, a patient must sufficiently understand the information given to them before making a treatment decision. On the one hand, there is a large group of patients who meet these conditions. On the other hand, there is a group that clearly does not meet these conditions, including comatose patients or patients in the late stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Then there is a group of patients who fall into the range in between. At the lower end of this range are so-called ‘marginal agents,’ which include young children and patients in the middle stages of Alzheimer’s disease. They also do not meet the typical requirements for autonomy, which is why they are usually granted fewer autonomy rights. However, some of them are capable of ‘pre-forms’ of autonomy that express what is important to them. These pre-forms differ from mere desires and reflect the identification/authenticity condition of autonomy. They have something in common with autonomous attitudes, choices, and actions – namely, they express the value of autonomy. As I will argue, autonomy is a value worthy of protection and promotion – even in its non-reflexive forms. Against this background, it becomes clear why we have autonomy duties, more precisely positive, autonomy-enabling duties, towards marginal agents and why we should give them as much attention as autonomy duties towards competent patients
Alternative medicine · Autonomy · Law and economics · Philosophy of medicine · Political science · Sociology · Computer Science · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Medicine · Patient Dignity and Privacy · Psychology · Social Psychology
Patientenautonomie und informierte Einwilligung
Anarchy, State, and Utopia
Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment
Autonomy, Gender, Politics
Welfare, Autonomy, and the Autonomy Fallacy
The Theory and Practice of Autonomy
How Much Should We Value Autonomy?
Relational Autonomy, Normative Authority and Perfectionism
Free Agency
Autonomy and Personal History
Personal Autonomy
Enhancing the Capacity for Autonomy
Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint
Children's Choices or Children's Interests
Teaching Children How to Think
From Best Interests to Better Interests? Values, Unwisdom and Objectivity in Mental Capacity Law
Capacity for Preferences and Pediatric Assent
Capacity for Preferences
Dworkin on Dementia
Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy
Autonomy, vulnerability and capacity
Well‐being as Enjoying the Good
Two Distinctions in Goodness
Deciding for Others
Caring and Internality
Re‐thinking the Mental Capacity Act 2005
Freedom and Fulfillment
Respecting the Margins of Agency
On Becoming an Adult
Competent children? Minors' consent to health care treatment and research
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |