The role of the enrolling clinician in emergency research conducted under an exception from informed consent

The Exception from Informed Consent (EFIC) permits patient enrolment into therapeutic emergency research where obtaining informed consent is challenging. Yet this fails to resolve a core ethical conflict in the research and has generated controversy. This is because existing justification and practice has relied on applying EFIC per study —a wholesale permission to enroll irrespective of circumstance—instead of per patient . Our novel justification for enrolment centers on applying EFIC per patient, which empowers the enrolling clinician to judge whether to enroll patients with an Exception. This contrasts with the idea that clinician judgment is surplus to the judgements already made by institutions in deciding the research may proceed. Instead, we show that enrolling clinician’s judgment is ethically significant and should not be overlooked: attending to this strengthens the research ethically and reduces controversy. There should be a bigger role for the clinician in the research enrolment space

Alternative medicine · Family medicine · Informed consent · Medical education · Pathology · Permission · Philosophy of medicine · Political science · Psychiatry · Research ethics · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in Clinical Research · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Medicine · Psychology