Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Eudaimonia and well-being

Questioning the moral authority of advance directives in dementia

Bibliographic Data

ID21702433
AuthorsPhilippa Byers (0000-0002-5526-6207, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume41
Issue1
Pages23-37
Publication date2020-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMetamedicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0166-2031 • E-ISSN: 1573-1200
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11017-020-09517-w
PMID32034586
OpenAlexW3005396903
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited19

This paper revisits Ronald Dworkin’s influential position that a person’s advance directive for future health care and medical treatment retains its moral authority beyond the onset of dementia, even when respecting this authority involves foreshortening the life of someone who is happy and content and who no longer remembers or identifies with instructions included within the advance directive. The analysis distils a eudaimonist perspective from Dworkin’s argument and traces variations of this perspective in further arguments for the moral authority of advance directives by other authors. It then critiques a feature of the eudaimonist perspectives within these arguments—namely, the position that dementia has a retroactive negative impact on what a person has previously valued—and challenges the commonly held assumption underlying them that a person’s life and well-being have relatively low value beyond the onset of dementia. Although advance directives have moral authority as a means of guiding one’s future health care, accounts that dismiss the value of the lives and well-being of people living with dementia should be questioned to the extent that such accounts are used to support the moral authority of advance directives stipulating measures to foreshorten individuals’ lives

Alternative medicine · Dementia · Directive · Disease · Epistemology · Philosophy of medicine · Sociology · Ethics in medical practice · Medicine · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Patient Dignity and Privacy · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Limits of advance directives in decision-making around food and nutrition in patients with dementia

    Wayne Shelton, Cynthia Geppert•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • The Limited Value of Dementia‐Specific Advance Directives

    Open Access•Rebecca Dresser•The Hastings Center Report•2021

  • The Philosophy of Well-Being

    Guy Fletcher•Philosophy of Well-Being•2016

  • Human Identity and Bioethics

    Open Access•David Degrazia•Human Identity and Bioethics•2005

  • The Ethics of Killing

    Jeff Mcmahan•The ethics of killing•2002

  • The essential moral self

    Open Access•Nina Strohminger, Shaun Nichol et al.•Cognition•2014

  • On Avoiding Deep Dementia

    Open Access•Norman L Cantor•The Hastings Center Report•2018

  • Advance Directives and Discrimination against People with Dementia

    Open Access•Rebecca Dresser•The Hastings Center Report•2018

  • “Tho’ much is taken, much abides”

    Open Access•Tia Powell•The Hastings Center Report•2018

  • Dworkin on Dementia

    Rebecca Dresser•The Hastings Center Report•1995

  • Reasons and Persons

    Derek Parfit•Reasons and persons•1986

  • Towards a Theory of Dementia Care

    Open Access•Tom Kitwood, Kathleen Bredin•Ageing and Society•1992

  • Personal Identity

    Derek Parfit•The Philosophical Review•1971

  • Respecting the Margins of Agency

    Open Access•Agnieszka Jaworska•Philosophy & Public Affairs•1999

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,4
Citation span2021 - 2024 (4)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae