“Overestimated technology – underestimated consequences” – reflections on risks, ethical conflicts, and social disparities in the handling of non-invasive prenatal tests (Nipts)

New technologies create new complexities. Since non-invasive prenatal tests (NIPTs) were first introduced, keeping pace with complexity constitutes an ongoing task for medical societies, politics, and practice. NIPTs analyse the chromosomes of the fetus from a small blood sample. Initially, NIPTs were targeted at detecting trisomy 21 (Down syndrome): meanwhile there are sequencing techniques capable of analysing the entire genome of the unborn child. These yield findings of unclear relevance for the child’s future life, resulting in new responsibility structures and dilemmas for the parents-to-be. The industry’s marketing strategies overemphasize the benefits of the tests while disregarding their consequences. This paper chooses the opposite path: starting with the underestimated consequences, it focuses on adverse developments and downsides. Disparities, paradoxes, and risks associated with NIPTs are illustrated, ethical conflicts described. Indications that new technologies developed to solve problems create new ones are examined. In the sense of critical thinking, seemingly robust knowledge is scrutinized for uncertainties and ambiguities. It analyses how the interplay between genetic knowledge and social discourse results in new dimensions of responsibility not only for parents-to-be, but also for decision-makers, authorities, and professional societies, illustrated by a review of different national policies and implementation programmes. As shown by the new NIPT policy in Norway, the consequences can be startling. Finally, a lawsuit in the United States illustrates how an agency can risk forfeiting its legitimation in connection with the inaccuracy of NIPTs

Emerging technologies · Engineering ethics · Medical law · Odds · Pace · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in Clinical Research · Law · Medicine · Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

• The salience of genomic information to reproductive autonomy

  Open Access•K Drysdale, Jackie Leach Scully et al.•New Genetics and Society•2024

  Add to list

• Preserving women’s reproductive autonomy while promoting the rights of people with disabilities

  Open Access•Adeline Perrot, Ruth Horn•Journal of Medical Ethics•2023

  Add to list

• The Market in Noninvasive Prenatal Tests and the Message to Consumers

  Open Access•Kelly Holloway, Norman Simms et al.•The Hastings Center Report•2022

  Add to list

• Simply providing information”

  Open Access•Niamh Stephenson, C Mills et al.•Feminism & Psychology•2017

  Add to list