Prioritising time for communication in healthcare—a normative analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21702741 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joar Björk (0000-0001-7194-4875, Uppsala University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-25 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medicine Health Care and Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1386-7423 • E-ISSN: 1572-8633 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11019-026-10364-0 |
| PMID | 42183973 |
| OpenAlex | W7162344562 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 49 |
Modern healthcare faces a mismatch in terms of supply and demand which makes careful priority setting imperative. The debate on priority setting in healthcare has focussed on pharmaceuticals and other tangible medical interventions. This article instead looks at the time that healthcare professionals have at their disposal. How should healthcare professionals divide their time between tangible medical interventions and communication with patients? What communicative goals should be prioritised? This normative analysis focusses on situations which involve time consuming communication between professionals and patients, which cannot easily be carried out alongside other medical interventions or is itself the main intervention as in psychotherapy. The arguments brought forth are applicable across the healthcare panorama and apply to all healthcare professions. It is argued that there are many different communicative goals which cannot be reduced to one type. Some recommendations are given and defended regarding the priority setting of different communicative goals. For reasons of value coherence and formal equality, all patients should be given a baseline amount of time for communication and time beyond that should be prioritised based on healthcare needs. If accepted, the arguments here highlight that a substantive part of healthcare’s (time) resources should be spent on communicative tasks. Indeed, it is time that we take time for communication seriously
Health care · Health communication · Health professionals · Medical law · Normative · Philosophy of medicine · Psychological intervention · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare cost, quality, practices · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Some limits of informed consent
How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes
Clinical Empathy as Emotional Labor in the Patient-Physician Relationship
Trust in Physicians and Medical Institutions
Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes
Escalating costs of innovative medicines
Biases distorting priority setting
Dignity and the Founding Myth of Bioethics
Dependence and Autonomy in Old Age
Priority setting in health care
Setting healthcare priorities in hospitals
| Highly cited | No |
|---|