Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Autonomous Military Systems

Collective responsibility and distributed burdens

Bibliographic Data

ID21703492
AuthorsNiël Henk Conradie (0000-0002-1916-3171, RWTH Aachen University, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume25
Issue1
Publication date2023-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthics and Information Technology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1388-1957 • E-ISSN: 1572-8439
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10676-023-09696-9
OpenAlexW4321599935
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited53

The introduction of Autonomous Military Systems (AMS) onto contemporary battlefields raises concerns that they will bring with them the possibility of a techno-responsibility gap, leaving insecurity about how to attribute responsibility in scenarios involving these systems. In this work I approach this problem in the domain of applied ethics with foundational conceptual work on autonomy and responsibility. I argue that concerns over the use of AMS can be assuaged by recognising the richly interrelated context in which these systems will most likely be deployed. This will allow us to move beyond the solely individualist understandings of responsibility at work in most treatments of these cases, toward one that includes collective responsibility. This allows us to attribute collective responsibility to the collectives of which the AMS form a part, and to account for the distribution of burdens that follows from this attribution. I argue that this expansion of our responsibility practices will close at least some otherwise intractable techno-responsibility gaps

Attribution · Autonomy · Collective responsibility · Environmental ethics · Individualism · Law and economics · Moral responsibility · Political science · Public relations · Social responsibility · Sociology · Engineering · Free Will and Agency · Law · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Psychology · Social Psychology · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • Is explainable AI responsible AI

    Open Access•Isaac Taylor•AI & Society•2025

  • From liability gaps to liability overlaps

    Open Access•Bart Custers, Henning Lahmann et al.•AI & Society•2025

  • Taking responsibility for the outcomes of autonomous technologies

    Open Access•Niël Henk Conradie, Saskia K Nagel•Ethics and Information Technology•2025

  • Collective Responsibility and Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Isaac Taylor•Philosophy & Technology•2024

  • Responsibility and Control

    Open Access•John Martin Fischer, Mark Ravizza•Responsibility and Control•1998

  • Hard Luck

    N Levy•Hard luck•2011

  • Responsibility from the Margins

    David Shoemaker•Responsibility from the Margins•2015

  • The responsibility gap

    Open Access•Andreas Matthias•Ethics and Information Technology•2004

  • Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems

    Open Access•Filippo Santoni de Sio, Jeroen Van Den Hoven•Frontiers in Robotics and AI•2018

  • Responsibility Incorporated

    Philip Pettit•Ethics•2007

  • Killer Robots

    Open Access•Robert Sparrow•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2007

  • Autonomy

    Joel Feinberg•Harm to Self (Moral Limits of the…•1989

  • Participant Reactive Attitudes and Collective Responsibility

    Deborah Tollefsen, Deborah Perron Tollefsen•Philosophical Explorations•2003

  • Collective Moral Responsibility

    Open Access•J Angelo Corlett•Journal of Social Philosophy•2001

  • The Importance of What We Care About

    Open Access•Harry G Frankfurt•Importance of What We Care About•1988

  • Collective Responsibility Gaps

    Open Access•Collin, Stephanie Collins•Journal of Business Ethics•2019

  • The Theory and Practice of Autonomy

    Open Access•Gerald Dworkin•Theory and Practice of Autonomy•1988

  • Collective Responsibility and Collective Obligations Without Collective Moral Agents

    Gunnar Björnsson•Routledge Handbook of Collective…•2020

  • Group Duties

    Collin, Stephanie Collins•Group Duties•2019

  • Terrorism, Retribution, and Collective Responsibility

    Mark R Reiff•Social Theory and Practice•2008

  • Autonomous Weapons and Distributed Responsibility

    Open Access•Marcus Schulzke•Philosophy & Technology•2013

  • The Possibility of Practical Reason

    Open Access•J David Velleman•The Possibility of Practical Reason•2015

  • Essays on Actions and Events

    Donald Davidson, Donald Herbert Davidson•Essays on actions and events•2001

  • Group Duties Without Decision-Making Procedures

    Open Access•Gunnar Björnsson•Journal of Social Ontology•2020

  • Individual and Collective Moral Responsibility for Systemic Military Atrocity

    Open Access•Neta C Crawford•Journal of Political Philosophy•2007

  • Smart Sanctions Revisited

    Open Access•Joy Gordon•Ethics & International Affairs•2011

  • Existence, really? Tacit disagreements about “existence” in disputes about group minds and corporate agents

    Open Access•Johannes Himmelreich•Synthese•2021

  • What are social groups? Their metaphysics and how to classify them

    Open Access•Brian Epstein•Synthese•2019

  • Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason

    J David Velleman, Michael E Bratman•The Philosophical Review•1991

  • In Praise of Desire

    Nomy Arpaly, Timothy Schroeder•In Praise Of Desire•2013

Unique citing works4
Citations per year2
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae