Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Substance metaphysics is incompatible with the causal closure of the metaphysical realm

Bibliographic Data

ID21710985
AuthorsFabrizio M Ferrari (0000-0002-1648-4180, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume1
Issue26
Pages78-102
Publication date2023-08-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRevista Ética e Filosofia Política (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1414-3917 • E-ISSN: 2448-2137
PublisherUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.34019/2448-2137.2023.41780
OpenAlexW4392151266
LanguageEN
References cited7

The present paper argues that substantialist metaphysics are in tension with the physicalist idea that the universe is causally closed. The argument is a rather specific one and proceeds through three steps. The first step consists in arguing that monistic substance metaphysics allow for the existence of entities that cannot belong to the intended first order domain. This result sensitively depends on the nature of substances as invariant entities. The second step concludes that, if further domains are to be admitted, then they are inhabited by “higher” or (systematically) “nonstandard” entities and that, in both cases if not made somehow innocuous, such entities may take part on the metaphysical construction of the world through their own distinctive properties and causal powers. However, this latter claim is in contradiction with causal closure. But closure is the principle that mainly characterizes physicalist approaches in metaphysics and as such physicalist metaphysics cannot get rid of it. Who attempted making exotic properties and causal powers innocuous usually appealed to the Supervenience Argument. Unfortunately, as the third step proves, this argument is invalid. Finally, the paper looks forward and toward alternative models for physicalist metaphysics, like processbased models. Keywords: Metaphysics of Quantities, Abstraction Principles, Locationism

Epistemology · Metaphysics · Political science · Realm · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Law · Philosophy · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life

  • Quantum Mechanics and Experience

    Open Access•David Z Albert•Quantum Mechanics and Experience•1992

  • The Myth of Nonreductive Materialism

    Jaegwon Kim•Proceedings and Addresses of the…•1989

  • What is ontic structural realism

    Open Access•Peter M Ainsworth•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2010

  • A process-based model for an interactive ontology

    Open Access•Richard Campbell•Synthese•2009

  • An argument against nominalism

    Open Access•Fabrizio M Ferrari•Synthese•2022

  • On the Preferability of Epistemic Structural Realism

    Open Access•Matteo Morganti•Synthese•2004

  • On gauge symmetries, indiscernibilities, and groupoid-theoretical equalities

    Open Access•Gabriel Catren•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2022

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae