Gender, number and person
A three-way interaction
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21714410 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas Berg (0000-0001-5895-5457, Department of English , 153618 University of Hamburg , Hamburg , Germany, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 537-565 |
| Publication date | 2024-10-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Linguistic Typology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1430-0532 • E-ISSN: 1613-415X |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/lingty-2023-0025 |
| OpenAlex | W4398132872 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 34 |
According to the principle of informativity, more useful information is more likely to be coded than less useful information. This principle underlies Greenberg’s Universals 37 and 45, which state that a larger number of (sex-based) gender contrasts are on average found in singular than in non-singular forms. As an increase in group size lowers the probability of same sex groups, gender-specific personal pronouns are less useful in the non-singular than in the singular. Curiously enough, the principle of informativity also makes the opposite prediction: in the first person, non-singular forms are predicted to show a gender contrast more frequently than singular forms do. Moreover, exclusive forms are predicted to develop gender distinctions more often than inclusive forms. In this paper, these predictions are put to a typological test. A total of 51 languages from 17 different families and 24 different genera has been found in which the first person singular personal pronoun is gender-neutral while one or more of its non-singular counterparts inflect for gender. It is argued that Universals 37 and 45, as well as their counterclaim, are empirically adequate. This apparent paradox dissolves in a three-way interaction of gender, number and person in pronominal paradigms. In keeping with the principle of informativity, there is a bias in favour of gender marking in the third person singular but also a bias in favour of gender marking in the first person non-singular
Linguistics · Personal pronoun · Problem of universals · Pronoun · Pure mathematics · Computer Science · Gender Studies in Language · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Mathematics · Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research · Philosophy · Artificial Intelligence
Clusivity
Reference in Discourse
The Paradigmatic Structure Of Person Marking
Introduction to Text Linguistics
Person
The rapid use of gender information
Nominal and pronominal gender
What's new? A comprehension bias in favor of informativity
Nominal classification
Gender marking in the first-person singular
Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries
A Grammar of Gaagudju
The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns
Large Linguistic Areas and Language Sampling
Ikonizität in Personalpronomina
Implicational generalizations in morphological syncretism
A Sketch of the Atakapa Language
Interaction of verbal categories
Informativity and the actuation of lenition
Some Functional Relationships in Grammar
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |