Producing Oedipus
Totem and Taboo Read Through Actor Network Theory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21717529 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Felipe Massao Kuzuhara (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 189-204 |
| Publication date | 2020-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychoanalysis and History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1460-8235 • E-ISSN: 1755-201X |
| Publisher | Edinburgh University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3366/pah.2020.0337 |
| OpenAlex | W3047187877 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 19 |
This article reads Freud's Totem and Taboo (1912–13) according to its role within the consolidation of the Oedipus complex. Freud's text is discussed with a focus on the process of knowledge production in psychoanalysis, and in relation to Bruno Latour's ideas of translation, association and black box. In this respect, this article regards a central feature of Totem and Taboo as being the articulation of a full-scale argument for the production of the Oedipus complex as ‘fact’. It is in this sense that different actors such as clinical cases, totemism, phylogenesis, the development of psychoanalytic theory and so on are considered here
Epistemology · Oedipus complex · Psychoanalysis · Psychoanalytic theory · Sociology · Taboo · Totem · Anthropology · Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices · Medicine · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Struggles and Negotiations to Define What is Problematic and What is Not
The Sense and Non-Sense of Revolt
Conversations on Science, Culture, and Time
Beyond Oedipus
The International Journal of Psychoanalysis
Meeting the Universe Halfway
After Method
Pandora's hope
If p, then what? Thinking in cases
Bruno Latour
The Couch as a Laboratory
The Body Multiple
Politiques de la nature
Cutting the Network
Totem and Taboo
Michel Serres
| Highly cited | No |
|---|