The Point is Still to Change it
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21719361 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Crystal Legacy (0000-0002-8687-7297, The University of Melbourne, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 511-515 |
| Publication date | 2021-08-08 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Planning Theory & Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1464-9357 • E-ISSN: 1470-000X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14649357.2021.1962054 |
| OpenAlex | W3191722715 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 11 |
In a 2011 Editorial for Planning Theory and Practice titled ‘The Point is to Change It’, Libby Porter treated readers to a passionate call to reveal planning’s politics. Evoking Marx, Porter argued
Geometry · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Mathematics · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Urban Planning and Governance
Unravelling the Concept of Social Transformation in Planning
The Future of the Planning Profession
Planning Solidarity? From Silence to Refusal
Post-Pandemic Planning
Covid-19, Place-making and Health
Planning for the Future
The political ambivalences of participatory planning initiatives
Planners – A silenced profession? The politicisation of planning and the need for fearless speech
Cities of care
The Point is to Change It
Situated solidarities and the practice of scholar-activism
| Citations per year | 1.6 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |