Forest set-aside policy for International biodiversity targets? Obstructive bureaucratic territoriality in Germany and Sweden
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21720098 |
|---|---|
| Autores | J Logmani-Aßmann (Chair of Forest and Nature Conservation Policy, University of Göttingen, Germany), Karin Beland Lindahl (0000-0001-6145-2252, Luleå University of Technology), Max Krott (0000-0002-7315-1390, University of Göttingen), Sarah Lilian Burns (0000-0001-8229-9234, Universidad Nacional de La Plata), Lukas Giessen (0000-0003-4050-0205) |
| Ano | 2021 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 448-461 |
| Data de publicação | 2021-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | The International Forestry Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1465-5489 • E-ISSN: 2053-7778 |
| Editora | Commonwealth Forestry Association (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1505/146554821834777251 |
| OpenAlex | W4205614525 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 32 |
Under the auspices of the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 requires setting aside vast currently managed areas for conservation purposes. Following bureaucratic politics theory, forestry and environmental domestic bureaucracies use these international targets in their struggle for power and territoriality over forested areas. Against this background, this study aims to analyze the resulting politics on setting aside forest areas from active forest management in Germany and Sweden. Employing a qualitative case study design and empirical data from policy documents and key informant interviews, our results indicate that bureaucracies prioritize instruments that are well aligned with their formal objectives, the interests of their informal constituencies, and their territorial interests. Such struggles dominate the development of policy instruments in both countries obstructing political compromise which results in a logjam in the development of substantial forest set-aside policy. We conclude that unless domestic politics and key bureaucracies provide conducive political conditions international commitments will be very difficult to achieve, even if they are formulated into clearly measurable international targets
Aside · Biodiversity · Biology · Bureaucracy · Compromise · Convention · Convention on Biological Diversity · Economics · Environmental resource management · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Set-aside · Territoriality · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies · Forest Management and Policy · Law · Public Administration · Ecology
Sweden does not meet agreed national and international forest biodiversity targets
From governance to government
Bureaucratic politics in protected areas
An obituary for national forest programmes? Analyzing and learning from the strategic use of “new modes of governance” in Germany and Bulgaria
The influence of non-governmental organisations on the creation of Natura 2000 during the European Policy process
Customizing elements of the International Forest Regime Complex in Poland? Non-implementation of a National Forest Programme and redefined transposition of Natura 2000 in Bialowieza Forest
The Swedish forestry model
The political economy of biodiversity in representative democracy
Forest management after the economic transition—at the crossroads between German and Scandinavian traditions
Towards a donut regime? Domestic actors, climatization, and the hollowing-out of the international forests regime in the Anthropocene
Forest property rights under attack”
Mitigating forest biodiversity and ecosystem service losses in the era of bio-based economy
Increasing representation of states by utilitarian as compared to environmental bureaucracies in international forest and forest–environmental policy negotiations
Whose Norms Prevail? Policy Networks, International Organizations and “Sustainable Forest Management”
Dismantling Comprehensive Forest Bureaucracies
Formal and Informal Interests of Donors to Allocate Aid
The World Bank Improving Environmental and Natural Resource Policies
Power players in biodiversity policy
Institutions for governing biodiversity offsetting
Regional governance by the South Asia Cooperative Environment Program (Sacep)? Institutional design and customizable regime policy offering flexible political options
Resilience through policy integration in Europe? Domestic forest policy changes as response to absorb pressure to integrate biodiversity conservation, bioenergy use and climate protection in France, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden
The fragmented land use administration in Indonesia – Analysing bureaucratic responsibilities influencing tropical rainforest transformation systems
State actors and international forest certification policy
Locating benefits
Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy
From Government to Governance? A Comparison of Environmental Governing in Swedish Forestry and Transport
Complex global governance and domestic policies
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |