Physical abuse by staff and co-residents of older people and people with intellectual disabilities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21721555 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Inger Kjellberg (0000-0002-6634-9331, University of Gothenburg, corresponding author), Karin Berg (0000-0003-2914-7500, University of Gothenburg) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 233-249 |
| Publication date | 2025-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Social Work (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1468-0173 • E-ISSN: 1741-296X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14680173241278257 |
| OpenAlex | W4403550149 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 32 |
Physical abuse in care settings is a social problem with detrimental effects for residents, but effective prevention is dependent on staff reporting. In Sweden, designated officials, commonly social workers, are required to investigate reports of mistreatment. The aim of this study was to analyze what designated officials considered serious in reported incidents of physical abuse in two different care settings: care for older people and care for people with intellectual disabilities. Similar cases of physical abuse were chosen to demonstrate differences between judgments and provide a picture of how designated officials judge the relative seriousness of abusive situations. Interpretative content analysis and analytic induction were used to analyze reports of staff-to-resident abuse and resident-to-resident abuse in the two care areas. Findings There were no differences between incidents described as serious and those described as non-serious. Resident-to-resident abuse was the most commonly reported incident, particularly in dementia care and care for people with intellectual disabilities, and was rarely considered serious. Older people in dementia care were the highest risk group. In staff-to-resident abuse, staff were singled out as scapegoats. Organizational issues, rather than the details of abusive incidents, guided investigators’ judgments of seriousness. Tendencies to normalize violence and apply a narrow understanding of violence were found in the investigator’s judgments, particularly in resident-to-resident abuse. Applications Safeguarding adults from physical abuse in institutional settings is dependent on staff reporting and thorough investigations. This study shows that more training in assessing violence for social workers investigating reports is needed
Disabled people · Intellectual disability · Older people · Political science · Psychiatry · Elder Abuse and Neglect · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Medicine · Psychology · Social Work · Gerontology
Violence in Europe
Analytic Induction
Prevalence and risk of violence against adults with disabilities
Content Analysis
A review of factors which potentially influence decisions in adult safeguarding investigations
Serious Case Reviews in Adult Safeguarding in England
Safeguarding vulnerable older people
Exploring mandatory reporting in social care and social services in Sweden
Identifying and responding to domestic abuse in the older population
A lad tried to get hold of my boobs, so I kicked him’
When is violence not a crime? Factors associated with victims’ labelling of violence as a crime
Scandals of abuse
Networked Decisions
Slaps, Punches, Pinches-But not Violence
Wicked problems or wicked people? Reconceptualising institutional abuse
Does 'Violent' Mean 'Bad'? Individual Definitions of Violence
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |