Literacy assessment in the early years of schooling in an era of neoliberalism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21722277 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Martina Tassone (0000-0002-3378-9445, The University of Melbourne-Melbourne Graduate School of Education, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 422-462 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Early Childhood Literacy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1468-7984 • E-ISSN: 1741-2919 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14687984231161119 |
| OpenAlex | W4377821259 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 49 |
This paper explores the literature related to literacy assessment in the early years of schooling in an era of neoliberalism and reports on a key aspect of a study which focused on the literacy assessment practices of early years teachers and literacy leaders in Australian Catholic schools within the Melbourne archdiocese. Background: The study was undertaken in a period following the Melbourne Catholic Education system’s devolution of literacy assessment responsibility to schools after a long period of mandated literacy assessment (1998–2012) but also occurred within a neoliberal high-stakes assessment environment, characterised by heightened levels of teacher accountability. Research Objectives: The intention of the research was to explore the literacy assessment beliefs and practices of teachers in early years classrooms (F–2), to explore the impacts of assessment devolution and the implications in terms of the literacy assessment practices in the early years in Australian Catholic primary schools in the Melbourne Archdiocese. Methods: A predominantly qualitative case study approach consisting of two phases was used to explore literacy assessment in the early years of schooling. Phase 1 consisted of an online questionnaire comprising both open and closed questions, which was completed by 76 literacy leaders from 76 Catholic schools in the Melbourne archdiocese. The questionnaire was designed to elicit information on schools’ literacy assessment practices in the early years and if these had changed since a Catholic Education Melbourne (CEM) policy change in 2012 allowing schools greater autonomy over literacy assessment in the early years. Phase 2 involved semistructured interviews with 23 early years teachers and seven literacy leaders from eight diverse schools to investigate their literacy assessment practices in greater detail and identify how they responded to the opportunities that came with devolved decision-making
Accountability · Autonomy · Literacy · Numeracy · Pedagogy · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Education Systems and Policy · Indigenous and Place-Based Education · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Pedagogy, Symbolic Control, and Identity
Global Education Inc.
The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse
Beyond ‘what works’
Inside the Black Box
Reading and Language in the Early Grades
Datafied at four
Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs
Knowledge and control
Paradoxes of Autonomy in Professional Life
Consumption and Identity at Work
When Teaching Interferes With Learning
From objects to subjects
Contesting educational assessment policies in Australia
Governing teacher learning
Binaries and beyond
Devising inequality
Neoliberalism and the (internal) marketisation of primary school assessment in England
Teachers’ Autonomy in Today's Educational Climate
Assessing No Child Left Behind and the Rise of Neoliberal Education Policies
The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity
American Secondary Education
Teachers' work and pedagogy in an era of accountability
Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |