Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Literacy assessment in the early years of schooling in an era of neoliberalism

Bibliographic Data

ID21722277
AuthorsMartina Tassone (0000-0002-3378-9445, The University of Melbourne-Melbourne Graduate School of Education, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume25
Issue2
Pages422-462
Publication date2025-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Early Childhood Literacy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1468-7984 • E-ISSN: 1741-2919
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/14687984231161119
OpenAlexW4377821259
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited49

This paper explores the literature related to literacy assessment in the early years of schooling in an era of neoliberalism and reports on a key aspect of a study which focused on the literacy assessment practices of early years teachers and literacy leaders in Australian Catholic schools within the Melbourne archdiocese. Background: The study was undertaken in a period following the Melbourne Catholic Education system’s devolution of literacy assessment responsibility to schools after a long period of mandated literacy assessment (1998–2012) but also occurred within a neoliberal high-stakes assessment environment, characterised by heightened levels of teacher accountability. Research Objectives: The intention of the research was to explore the literacy assessment beliefs and practices of teachers in early years classrooms (F–2), to explore the impacts of assessment devolution and the implications in terms of the literacy assessment practices in the early years in Australian Catholic primary schools in the Melbourne Archdiocese. Methods: A predominantly qualitative case study approach consisting of two phases was used to explore literacy assessment in the early years of schooling. Phase 1 consisted of an online questionnaire comprising both open and closed questions, which was completed by 76 literacy leaders from 76 Catholic schools in the Melbourne archdiocese. The questionnaire was designed to elicit information on schools’ literacy assessment practices in the early years and if these had changed since a Catholic Education Melbourne (CEM) policy change in 2012 allowing schools greater autonomy over literacy assessment in the early years. Phase 2 involved semistructured interviews with 23 early years teachers and seven literacy leaders from eight diverse schools to investigate their literacy assessment practices in greater detail and identify how they responded to the opportunities that came with devolved decision-making

Accountability · Autonomy · Literacy · Numeracy · Pedagogy · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Education Systems and Policy · Indigenous and Place-Based Education · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies

  • Lectura por placer en la Educación Secundaria

    Open Access•Edna-Liliana Herrera-Lozano, Carola Gómez Medina•Ocnos•2026

  • Theorizing the Children’s Museum

    Open Access•Tarah Connolly•Journal of Early Childhood Literacy•2025

  • (Re)Writing the Profession

    Erica Holyoke, Susan Tily•Research in the Teaching of English•2026

  • What does decentring the human in literacy research do

    Open Access•Natalie Thompson, Sheena Elwick•Qualitative Research Journal•2025

  • Pedagogy, Symbolic Control, and Identity

    Basil Bernstein•Pedagogy, Symbolic Control, and…•2000

  • Global Education Inc.

    Stephen Ball, Stephen J Ball•Global education inc•2012

  • The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse

    Basil Bernstein•Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse•2004

  • Beyond ‘what works’

    Nicole Mockler•Teachers and Teaching•2011

  • Inside the Black Box

    Open Access•Paul Black, Dylan Wiliam•Phi Delta Kappan•2010

  • Reading and Language in the Early Grades

    Catherine E Snow, Timothy J Matthews•The Future of Children•2016

  • Datafied at four

    Alice Bradbury•Learning Media and Technology•2019

  • Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs

    Helenrose Fives, Michelle M Buehl•APA Educational Psychology…•2012

  • Knowledge and control

    Michael F D Young•Knowledge and control: new…•1971

  • Paradoxes of Autonomy in Professional Life

    Alice J Pitt, Alice Pitt et al.•Changing English•2008

  • Consumption and Identity at Work

    Paul Du Gay•Consumption and identity at work•1996

  • When Teaching Interferes With Learning

    Susan Twombly, Susan B Twombly•The New Educator•2014

  • From objects to subjects

    Open Access•Scott Ellison, Ashlee Anderson et al.•Teaching and Teacher Education•2018

  • Contesting educational assessment policies in Australia

    Joy Cummings, Fabienne van der Kleij et al.•Journal of Education Policy•2019

  • Governing teacher learning

    Ian Hardy•Journal of Education Policy•2018

  • Binaries and beyond

    Honglin Chen, Beverly Derewianka•Research Papers in Education•2009

  • Devising inequality

    Wayne Au, Wayne W Au•British Journal of Sociology of…•2008

  • Neoliberalism and the (internal) marketisation of primary school assessment in England

    Open Access•Nick Pratt•British Educational Research…•2016

  • Teachers’ Autonomy in Today's Educational Climate

    Luman E G Strong, Roland K Yoshida•Educational Studies•2014

  • Assessing No Child Left Behind and the Rise of Neoliberal Education Policies

    Open Access•Dan Hursh, David Hursh•American Educational Research…•2007

  • The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity

    Stephen Ball•Journal of Education Policy•2003

  • American Secondary Education

    Open Access•Charles H Judd•Journal of Education•1928

  • Teachers' work and pedagogy in an era of accountability

    Open Access•Barbara Comber, Helen Nixon•Discourse Studies in the Cultural…•2009

  • Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design

    Open Access•Nataliya V Ivankova, John W Creswell et al.•CAM•2006

Unique citing works4
Citations per year4
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae