Examining the institutional drivers of public-private partnership (PPP) market performance
A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21723494 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Carter B Casady (0000-0001-9215-7168, Stanford University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 23 |
| Número | 7 |
| Páginas | 981-1005 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Public Management Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1471-9037 • E-ISSN: 1471-9045 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14719037.2019.1708439 |
| OpenAlex | W3000497931 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 23 |
| Referencias citadas | 45 |
This study explores whether different constellations of institutional factors create unique causal ‘paths’ to mature PPP market performance. Using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), the institutional settings of 48 different PPP markets across Latin American and the Caribbean (LAC), Central and Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (CEMA), and the Asia-Pacific region (APAC) are examined. The results show market reliability, political and social will, and regulatory regimes are necessary, but alone not sufficient, conditions for mature PPP market performance. The absence of market transparency also appears to be far less problematic for PPP market performance than previously assumed
Economics · General partnership · Latin Americans · Political science · Qualitative comparative analysis · Construction Project Management and Performance · Public Procurement and Policy · Public-Private Partnership Projects · Finance
The influence of governance on the implementation of Public-Private Partnerships in the United Kingdom and China
Can public-private partnerships drive transformational climate adaptation? Seafood sector pathways in Aotearoa New Zealand
Navigating Institutional Distance
What triggers public-private partnership (PPP) renegotiations in the United States
Enabling PSL and value co-creation through public engagement
Governmental support strategies and their effects on private capital engagement in public–private partnerships
A time differencing qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of public-private partnership (PPP) market maturity
Contractual acrobatics
A bird in the hand
Preventing disaster-related deaths
Evitando óbitos em desastres
Addressing Adverse Selection in Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Procurement
Governance and Renegotiation in Public‐Private Partnerships During Crises
Can public‐private innovation partnerships improve public services? Evidence from a synthetic control approach
Contextual recipes for adopting private control and trust in public–private partnership governance
The effects of contractual and relational governance on public‐private partnership sustainability
Bureaucratic redundancy and administrative burden
Determinants of public-private partnership governance structures
The institutional challenges of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in transition economies
The governance of affordable housing through public-private partnerships
The Distortion of Public–Private Partnerships in China
In search of the collaborative advantage of public‐private partnerships
Commercial investment in public–private partnerships
Understanding Policy Success
Public–private partnerships
Comparative Research Design
Managing Legitimacy
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as an Approach
Transparency
The Comparative Method
Configurational Comparative Methods
National Varieties of Public–Private Partnerships (PPPs)
On Public–Private Partnership Performance
Public–Private Partnerships
The Public–Private Partnership Enabling Field
Fuzzy-Set Social Science
Partnership Arrangements
On the Development of Public–Private Partnerships in Transitional Economies
Transparency in Public–private Partnerships
Democratic Accountability in Public–private Partnerships
From “smart regulation” to “regulatory arrangements”
The Iron Cage Revisited
| Obras citantes distintas | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3,83 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 22 |