Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Now you see them, now you don’t

Professional recognition of specialist professionals working with Deaf British Sign Language parents in child safeguarding

Bibliographic Data

ID21724554
AuthorsRichard Oram (0000-0003-2224-0948, University of Manchester, corresponding author), A Young (0000-0001-8551-5078, University of Manchester), Patricia Cartney (0000-0002-0564-1881, University of Manchester)
Year2024
Volume23
Issue1
Pages91-107
Publication date2024-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueQualitative Social Work (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1473-3250 • E-ISSN: 1741-3117
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/14733250231185962
OpenAlexW4383104412
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited20

This paper concerns parenting assessments which are integral to child-safeguarding professional processes in England, and which involve Deaf parents whose primary language is British Sign Language (BSL). In an under-researched area of social work, the research aim was to contribute to the existing literature by eliciting the practice wisdom of specialist professionals. Specifically, it draws upon their linguistic and cultural knowledge of the Deaf community when they are involved in parenting assessments with Deaf parents who are subject to safeguarding concerns. Data about these professionals’ actual experiences of navigating Deaf cultural-competency in contemporary child protection practices were collected through seven video-recorded, semi-structured interviews conducted in BSL. Using interpretive phenomenological analysis, data were analysed in their source language (BSL). This article focusses on one key theme, termed ‘Professional Recognition’, which incorporates a) the identification of specialist roles and b) the impact of referral processes and protocols on assessment outcomes. The findings highlight participants’ perspectives on the benefits and disadvantages of their specialist role in this context. Although their brokerage skills, cultural competence, linguistic fluency and specialist knowledge of the Deaf community are highly regarded and valued by some colleagues, there is insufficient recognition of their existence by the majority. Secondly, participants are concerned by the inefficiency and inconsistency of the referral processes and protocols which they consider have adverse effects on assessment outcomes, and consequently the parents involved. The BSL translation of this article is available in the supplementary material

Child protection · Health care · Health professionals · Linguistics · Political science · Safeguarding · Sign language · Disability Rights and Representation · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology

  • Assessing deaf parents in safeguarding and child protection processes

    Open Access•Richard Oram, Patricia Cartney et al.•Qualitative Social Work•2025

  • Giving voice by doing with not doing through

    Open Access•Peter Simcock, Jill Manthorpe et al.•Qualitative Social Work•2025

  • Standing at the crossroads

    Open Access•Richard Oram, A Young et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2025

  • Oral History Theory

    Lynn Abrams•Oral History Theory•2016

  • Understanding Deaf Culture

    Paddy Ladd•Understanding Deaf Culture•2003

  • The Linguistics of British Sign Language

    Open Access•Rachel Sutton-Spence, Rachel Louise Sutton-Spence et al.•Linguistics of British Sign…•1999

  • The reflective practitioner

    Donald A Schon•The reflective practitioner•1991

  • Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis

    James Briggs•QMiP Bulletin•2010

  • A Pilot Study of Deaf Trauma Survivors’ Experiences

    Open Access•Melissa L Anderson, Kelly S Wolf Craig et al.•Journal of Child & Adolescent…•2016

  • Literacy Outcomes in Deaf Students with Cochlear Implants

    Connie Mayer, Beverly J Trezek•The Journal of Deaf Studies and…•2018

  • Safeguarding Deaf Children

    Shirley Wilson, Michelle Attrill et al.•Practice•2018

  • Exploring analytical trustworthiness and the process of reaching consensus in interpretative phenomenological analysis

    Karen Rodham, Fiona Fox et al.•International Journal of Social…•2013

  • Working with Deaf People

    DAVID PARRATT•Disability & Society•1995

  • Disadvantage and Discrimination Compounded

    Qulsom Fazil, Paul Bywaters et al.•Disability & Society•2002

  • Lost in Translation

    Katrin Križ, Marit Skivenes•The British Journal of Social Work•2010

  • Perceptions of the ‘Occupational Other’

    Rebecca Tipton•The British Journal of Social Work•2016

  • Cultural brokerage

    Open Access•Ming-Cheng Miriam Lo•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2010

  • Whose Voices? Whose Knowledge? A Feminist Analysis of the Value of Key Informant Interviews

    Open Access•Michelle Lokot•International Journal of…•2021

  • Qualitative Research and Translation Dilemmas

    Open Access•Bogusia Temple, A Young•Qualitative Research•2004

Unique citing works3
Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae