Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Nonoverlapping Magisteria Versus Science-Religion Integration

Rereading Stephen Jay Gould

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21725444
AutoresSamuli Helama (0000-0002-9777-3354, autor correspondente)
Ano2024
Volume22
Fascículo2
Páginas393-406
Data de publicação2024-04-02
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoTheology and Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1474-6700 • E-ISSN: 1474-6719
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14746700.2024.2351648
OpenAlexW4398349726
IdiomaEN

The principle of nonoverlapping magisteria (NOMA), by Stephen Jay Gould, is commonly cited in the science-religion literature as an archetype of a model separating the domains of science and religion. As such, NOMA represents the independence category in Ian Barbour’s science-religion typology. However, it is commonly neglected that NOMA also permits dialogue and even integration of scientific and religious inputs at the personal level, i.e. beyond the level of magisteria. To distinguish the two levels, it is essential to note that Gould considered the magisteria not as any kind of domain but closely related to teaching authorities

Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Theology · Evolution and Science Education · Philosophy · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae