A Discussion of Klass Landsman’s Criticisms of the Fine-Tuning Argument
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21725600 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kai-Yan Chan, Man Ho Chan (0000-0001-5088-9117), Man-Ho Chan |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 279-289 |
| Publication date | 2020-04-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theology and Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1474-6700 • E-ISSN: 1474-6719 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14746700.2020.1755544 |
| OpenAlex | W3024269369 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
Recently, Klass Landsman has published an article to argue that cosmic fine-tuning is neither a piece of good evidence for the design hypothesis nor a piece of good evidence for the multiverse hypothesis. In this article, we will focus on his criticisms of the fine-tuning design argument and provide a critical discussion on his arguments. We show that none of his criticisms are cogent
Economics · Epistemology · Optics · Physics · Positive economics · Teleological argument · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs · Philosophy · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
| Citations per year | 0.75 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2023 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |