Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Non-affirmative theory as an analytical lens for the analysis of European citizenship education policy

Bibliographic Data

ID21725784
AuthorsErik Ryen (0000-0002-4727-0249, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Publication date2025-10-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Educational Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1474-9041 • E-ISSN: 2165-8714
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/14749041251379628
OpenAlexW4415189128
LanguageEN
References cited37

This article explores the potential of the non-affirmative theory of education (NAT) for analysing European citizenship education (CE) policy. The starting point is the so-called pedagogical paradox, which denotes an enduring tension within educational theory between the assumption that the individual must be educated to become free and the understanding of education as a process of free self-formation. According to NAT, the paradox may be dealt with by seeing education as a ‘summoning to self-activity’ whereby students are taught in ways that recognise their individuality and right to form themselves in a reflexive engagement with their environment. The article applies this conceptual apparatus in a critical analysis of the Council of Europe’s Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture (RFCDC), which seeks to standardise learning outcomes for CE across Europe. The analysis shows that an affirmative logic permeates the RFCDC, as national governments, teachers and students are expected to recognise the developed competence model as a valid description of what it means to be a democratic citizen. The article concludes that NAT has the potential to enrich current debates on the direction of European CE policy at a time when liberal democracy appears to be under increasing pressure

Citizenship · Citizenship education · Democracy · Democratic Theory · Disadvantage · Education policy · Policy analysis · Reflexivity · Global Education and Multiculturalism · Global Educational Policies and Reforms · Religious Education and Schools

  • Re-Reading Education Policies

    Maarten Simons, Mark Olssen et al.•Re-Reading Education Policies•2009

  • The rise and change of the competence strategy

    Open Access•Kathryn Telling, Martino Serapioni•European Journal of Educational…•2019

  • Citizenship-as-knowledge

    Open Access•Erik Ryen, Evy Jøsok•European Journal of Educational…•2023

  • Citizenship-as-competence, what else ? Why European citizenship education policy threatens to fall short of its aims

    Open Access•Margot Joris, Mary Simons et al.•European Journal of Educational…•2022

  • Options for developing European strategies on citizenship education

    Open Access•Hermann J Abs•European Journal of Educational…•2021

  • On powerful knowledge as a policy concept and sociological theory

    Open Access•Michael Uljens•Journal of Curriculum Studies•2025

  • Restrained Teaching

    Open Access•Stefan Hopmann•European Journal of Educational…•2007

  • Why “What Works” Won’t Work

    Open Access•Gert Biesta•Educational Theory•2007

  • Affective ideology and education policy

    M Zembylas•Journal of Education Policy•2022

  • The council of Europe’s competences for democratic culture

    Michelle Tourbier•Educational Philosophy and Theory•2019

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae