Fuzzytechie languaging and consilience

Dataphilosophy and transdisciplinary digital force for justice

Bibliographic Data

ID21728069
AuthorsAnne B Reinertsen (0000-0003-0467-4515, Østfold University of Applied Sciences, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume18
Issue4
Pages453-466
Publication date2020-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolicy Futures in Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1478-2103 • E-ISSN: 1478-2103
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1478210319900599
OpenAlexW3003341580
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited10

Digitalization of our educational systems is moving faster and deeper into our institutions. I applaud it because it has the potential to save time and effort, allowing me to spend more time on the most important part of my work as a scholar. But I am regularly sick to my stomach about what I applaud, because there is no potential and any news or justice in it unless I conquer it. Moreover, unless I do- conquer that is, it works as much against (non)knowledges as the opposite, and this is speeding up. Hence, I speculate with the concepts of speed and force. I ask, how is it possible to add or speed up and strengthen digital diversity for justice to highlight the entangled contours of knowledges, inequality, equality and quality in education? My gut feeling tells me that my subjective professionalism is under siege and that I need to take back the concept of objectivity to survive. It is paradoxically slow but fast, paradoxically objective but subjective, strong but weak. It implies a liberating loss of control to importance. Education becoming eventicized, professionals and teachers becoming transdisciplinary dataphilosophers

Consilience · Economic Justice · Epistemology · Feeling · Inequality · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Digital Education and Society · Law · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOI