A review of neurological support for universal design for learning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21728147 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Guy A Boysen (0000-0003-3869-9585, McKendree University, corresponding author), Kelsey D Lyles (McKendree University), Mia M Wylie (McKendree University), Divine Favour C Ozomma (McKendree University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Policy Futures in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1478-2103 • E-ISSN: 1478-2103 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14782103251412473 |
| OpenAlex | W7117136394 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 45 |
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is an educational framework designed to optimize learning opportunities by increasing accessibility for all students. The organization CAST has created guidelines for UDL implementation, which they claim are based on neuroscientific research about specific regions of the brain. This study systematically reviewed the neuroscientific research cited on the CAST website to support their guidelines. Results showed that the guidelines were not supported by neuroscience. Only 1% of the 1442 unique sources cited by CAST represented neuroscience and 75% of the UDL guidelines had no neuroscientific sources. The neuroscientific sources cited by CAST mostly demonstrated activity across multiple brain regions, which contradicts their proposed alignment of guidelines with three distinct brain areas. Only one source had direct implications for the educational practices in its associated UDL guideline. Most sources simply showed that the brain was active when people engage in activities mentioned in the guidelines. A secondary review of the research literature using a scholarly database produced no examples of neuroscientific studies about UDL. This review suggests that UDL’s policies cannot accurately be portrayed as having a basis in neuroscience. Given the absence of evidence, neuroscientific claims about UDL should end
Brain research · Educational research · Universal design · Universal Design for Learning · Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility · Disability Education and Employment · Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
The Influences of Emotion on Learning and Memory
Do Learners Really Know Best? Urban Legends in Education
Neuroscience and education
A Review of Research on Universal Design Educational Models
Executive Functions
A critical analysis of the research evidence behind Cast’s universal design for learning guidelines
Research or policy – which lever pushes practice faster? A universal design for learning historical footnote
Belief without evidence? A policy research note on Universal Design for Learning
A critical analysis of universal design for learning in the U.S. federal education law
Multiple means of representation? A critical analysis of Universal Design for Learning checkpoint 1.2
Exploring universal design for learning as an accessibility tool in higher education
Neuroscience explanations really do satisfy
The effectiveness of universal design for learning
Education and the Brain
Learning Styles
Extending the seductive allure of neuroscience explanations effect to popular articles about educational topics
Contributions of Neuroscience to a New Empathy Epistemology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |