Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Teacher- Versus AI-Generated (Poe Application) Corrective Feedback and Language Learners’ Writing Anxiety, Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21729344
AutoresDan Wang (0000-0001-8174-0024, East China University of Political Science and Law, autor correspondente)
Ano2024
Volume25
Fascículo3
Páginas37-56
Data de publicação2024-08-26
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoThe International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1492-3831 • E-ISSN: 1492-3831
EditoraAthabasca University Press (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7646
OpenAlexW4401873351
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas21
Referências citadas21

This study examines the effects of corrective feedback (CF) on language learners’ writing anxiety, writing complexity, fluency, and accuracy, and compares the effectiveness of feedback from human teachers with an AI-driven application called Poe. The study included three intact classes, each with 25 language learners. Using a quasi-experimental design with pretest and posttest measures, one class received feedback from the teacher, one from the Poe application, and the third received no response to their writing. Data were generated though tests and a writing anxiety scale developed for the study. Data analysis, conducted using one-way ANOVA tests, revealed significant effects of teacher and AI-generated feedback on learners’ writing anxiety, accuracy, and fluency. Interestingly, the group that received AI-generated feedback performed better than the group that received teacher feedback or no AI support. Additionally, learners in the AI-generated feedback group experienced a more significant reduction in writing anxiety than their peers. These results highlight the remarkable impact of AI-generated CF on improving writing outcomes and alleviating anxiety in undergraduate language learners at East China University of Political Science and Law . The study demonstrates the benefits of integrating AI applications into language learning contexts, particularly by promoting a supportive environment for students to develop writing skills. Educators, researchers, and developers can use these findings to inform pedagogical practices and technological interventions to optimize the language learning experience in primary school settings. This research highlights the effectiveness of AI-driven applications in language teaching. It highlights the importance of considering learners’ psychological well-being, particularly anxiety levels, when developing effective language learning interventions

Anxiety · Cognitive psychology · Computer-Assisted Instruction · Computer-mediated communication · Corrective Feedback · Fluency · Language acquisition · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Multimedia · Second language · Second language writing · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Educational Technology and Pedagogy · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Online Learning and Analytics · Psychology

  • Students’ readiness for digital technology and perceptions of GenAI versus teacher feedback in interpreting training

    Open Access•Lingxi Fan, Lingsong Xiong et al.•The Interpreter and Translator…•2026

  • Navigating the emotional journey of writing feedback

    Open Access•Wenlei Zhu, Yao Zheng•Assessing Writing•2026

  • Cultivating Empathy in the Age of AI

    Open Access•Rachel Bryson, Thabata Fay et al.•Technical Communication Quarterly•2026

  • Exploring the Impact of Generative AI-Powered Conversational Agents on Student Learning

    Open Access•xiaochen suo, Baoyuan Yin et al.•Journal of Educational Computing…•2026

  • The Effects of Artificial Intelligence-Based Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback on Second Language Writing and User Sentiment

    Open Access•K JAMES HARTSHORN, Austin Pack•RELC Journal•2026

  • AI-driven language learning in higher education

    Open Access•Min He, He Min et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Epistemic authority and generative AI in learning spaces

    Open Access•Binny Jose, Anu Cleetus et al.•Frontiers in Education•2025

  • Personalized language learning with an LLM chatbot

    Open Access•Alireza M Kamelabad, Beatrice Turano et al.•Frontiers in Education•2026

  • The impact of EFL learners’ perceived teacher emotions on learning engagement

    Open Access•Hong Shi, Ruoxi Liu•Frontiers in Education•2025

  • Mapping the landscape of AI-driven feedback in education

    Open Access•Anastasiya A Lipnevich, Carmen A Taranto et al.•Frontiers in Education•2026

  • Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices

    Open Access•Thi Thanh Thao TRAN•Education Sciences•2025

  • The promise and limits of artificial intelligence in writing assessment and instruction

    Open Access•Yue-liang Pan, Yue‐Liang Pan et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2026

  • Learner perceptions of AI-generated feedback on L2 speaking in the ESP context

    Open Access•Mustafa Yolum, Derin Atay•English for Specific Purposes•2026

  • AI ‐Facilitated Article Revisions for Primary School Students With Writing Difficulties

    Open Access•Xinli Zhang, Ru Huang et al.•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2025

  • Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on English language teaching

    Open Access•Feyza Nur Ekizer•Acta Psychologica•2025

  • Customising chatbots for writing development

    Open Access•Lucy Macnaught•Journal of English for Academic…•2026

  • Can GenAI-empowered feedback promote L2 learners’ self-regulation strategic behavior and writing performance

    Open Access•Lin Sophie Teng, Xinjie Deng et al.•System•2026

  • Comparing Generative AI and teacher feedback

    Open Access•M Henderson, Margaret Bearman et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2025

  • Feedback encounters in doctoral supervision

    Open Access•Lasse X Jensen, Margaret Bearman et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2025

  • A systematic review of AI-based feedback in educational settings

    Open Access•Hatice Yıldız Durak, Aytuğ Onan•Journal of Computational Social…•2025

  • Reducing anxiety, promoting enjoyment and enhancing overall English proficiency

    Open Access•Yu Wang, Wang Yu•British Educational Research…•2025

  • Challenges and Future Directions of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Education

    Open Access•Hui Luan, Peter Geczy et al.•Frontiers in Psychology•2020

  • Application and theory gaps during the rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education

    Open Access•Xieling Chen, Haoran Xie et al.•Computers and Education:…•2020

  • Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom

    Open Access•Ye Han, Fiona Hyland•Journal of Second Language Writing•2015

  • The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy

    Open Access•Eun Young Kang, Eunyoung Kang et al.•Modern Language Journal•2015

  • Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development

    Open Access•Rod Ellis•L2 Journal•2009

  • A typology of written corrective feedback types

    Rod Ellis•ELT Journal•2008

  • Input, Interaction, and Second‐language Acquisition

    Open Access•M H Long•Annals of the New York Academy of…•1981

  • Conceptualizing AI literacy

    Open Access•Davy Tsz Kit Ng, Jac Ka Lok Leung et al.•Computers and Education:…•2021

  • Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing

    Open Access•Qiandi Liu, Dan Brown•Journal of Second Language Writing•2015

  • What if the devil is my guardian angel

    Open Access•Ahmed Tlili, Boulus Shehata et al.•Smart Learning Environments•2023

  • Making Sense of the Digital Automation of Education

    Open Access•Neil Selwyn, Thomas Hillman et al.•Postdigital Science and Education•2023

  • The quality assurance of a national English writing assessment

    Open Access•Yingliang Liu, Jinyan Huang•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2020

  • Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators

    Open Access•Olaf Zawacki-Richter, Victoria I Marín et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • The reliability and validity of automated tools for examining variation in syntactic complexity across genres

    Open Access•Charlene Polio, Hyung‐Jo Yoon•International Journal of Applied…•2018

  • Task‐based language teaching

    Open Access•Rod Ellis•International Journal of Applied…•2009

  • Outcome measure of L2 writing as a mediator of the effects of corrective feedback on students' ability to write accurately

    Open Access•Anastasia Riazantseva•System•2012

  • The effect of highly focused versus mid-focused written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge development

    Open Access•Tiefu Zhang•System•2021

  • Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System

    Open Access•Shaofeng Li, A C De Vuono et al.•System•2019

  • Feedback on second language students' writing

    Open Access•K Hyland, Fiona Hyland•Language Teaching•2006

  • Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback in Developmental Multilingual Writing Classes

    Open Access•Kendon Kurzer•TESOL Quarterly•2018

  • The Differential Effects of Comprehensive Feedback Forms in the Second Language Writing Class

    Open Access•Marisela Bonilla López, Elke Van Steendam et al.•Language Learning•2018

Obras citantes distintas21
Citações por ano21
Intervalo de citações2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 21
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae