Unwarranted Notoriety? The Ritter Trials, 1882–1886
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21730699 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hanna Kozińska-Witt (0000-0003-1806-8305, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Issue | 1 (45) |
| Pages | 75-109 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studia Judaica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1506-9729 • E-ISSN: 2450-0100 |
| Publisher | Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4467/24500100stj.20.003.12917 |
| OpenAlex | W3106611789 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
Moses and Gitla Ritter were accused of murdering the charwoman Franciszka Mnichówna. The accusation and trials which followed revoked the blood libel. In three circumstantial trials (1882–1886), despite the lack of evidence, the Ritters were found guilty and sentenced to death. Owing to the “ritual” nature attributed to the presumed murder, the trials became media events, followed by an international audience. The author discusses the course of the trials, considering whether and how the municipalities in which they took place exploited their unexpected popularity for promotional purposes. What importance did the urban elites attach to the trials? How can we interpret the three guilty verdicts, and what symbolic significance can be assigned to them
Circumstantial evidence · Criminology · False accusation · Political science · Popularity · European history and politics · European Political History Analysis · History · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|