The Limits of Governmentality
Call-in Radio and the Subversion of Neoliberal Evangelism in Zambia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2173370 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alastair Fraser (0000-0003-2819-6474, African Politics, SOAS, University of London, London, UK, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 41-57 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of African Cultural Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-6815 • E-ISSN: 1469-9346 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13696815.2023.2283179 |
| OpenAlex | W4388978062 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 21 |
The spread of mobile telephones in Africa has enabled a broad range of citizens to join live conversations on call-in radio shows. Both African governments and foreign aid agencies claim that broadcasting such debates can raise awareness, amplify the voices of the poor, and facilitate development and better governance; they now fund a large share of interactive shows in some countries. Critics of such participatory initiatives typically accept that they have powerful effects but worry that debates among citizens are deployed as a technology of “governmentality”, producing forms of popular subjectivity compatible with elitist economic systems and technocratic political regimes. This article argues that instrumentalising political debate is harder than either side assumes, and that the consequences of these shows are mainly unintended. It develops an in-depth case of a Zambian call-in radio programme, “Let’s Be Responsible Citizens”, emphasising the ability of the show’s audience, and its host, to subvert the programme’s surveillance and governmentality agenda, and to insist that the key responsibilities of citizens are to criticise, rather than adapt to, policies and systems of governance that do not meet their needs
Business · Citizen journalism · Corporate governance · Disinformation · Governmentality · Media studies · Neoliberalism (international relations · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social media · Sociology · Subversion · Technocracy · Digital Games and Media · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Public Administration
Four caveats for participatory solid waste management in Lusaka, Zambia
Gogo Breeze
Citizens and Service Delivery
Urban Poverty and Party Populism in African Democracies
Building States and Civil Societies in Africa
Neoliberal governance and ‘responsibilization’ of agents
Development Communication Sourcebook
Governance, the World Bank and Liberal Theory
Post-populism in Zambia
How Zambia's Opposition Won
The limits of governmentality
Of cabbages and King Cobra
New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance
Youth Participation in Radio Listening Clubs in Malawi
Men Between
Aid, Accountability, and Democracy in Africa
Social Reconstruction and the Radicalization of Development
Electoral turnovers and the disappointment of enduring presidential power
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |