Texts on textiles
Proverbiality as characteristic of equivocal communication at the East African coast (Swahili)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2173471 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rose Marie Beck |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 131-160 |
| Publication date | 2005-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of African Cultural Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-6815 • E-ISSN: 1469-9346 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13696850500448246 |
| OpenAlex | W2009257754 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
| References cited | 26 |
This article argues that proverbiality may be understood to include more than abstract properties of short, poetically condensed texts. Rather, proverbiality is seen as a characteristic of a specific communicative strategy in which equivocation plays a major role. The proverb itself is perceived as its manifestation. The empirical material on which this hypothesis is based consists of case studies of interpersonal communication by means of the wrap cloth kanga from the East African coast (Swahili). The kanga has proverbial texts printed on it, whose topics are subject to speech prohibitions: love, conflict and exhortative sayings. The cloths are used to ‘say’ something while ‘saying’ nothing. On the background of studies on proverb performance Bavelas' (1990) model on equivocal communication is used to explain the ‘how’ of kanga-communication. In order to explain the ‘why’ it is combined with some aspects of Brown & Levinson's (1987) politeness theory. In the case of the kanga, equivocation reaches amazing dimensions, ambiguating not only the four elements of addressing person, content, addresee, and context (Bavelas), but also to the medium, the kanga, which is at the core of the ambiguation processes surrounding the kanga. A focus is set on how exactly the elements are ambiguated. As to the ‘why’, it ‘works’ only in close social relationships, crosses hierarchies (of age, descent, gender), and touches on socially sensitive topics, as is expected of avoidance-communication. Overall, it is a communicative genre which affirms and subverts rather than transforms and violates rules, expressing the arrangement of women in a patriarchal society
Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Equivocation · Interpersonal communication · Linguistics · Nothing · Politeness · Pragmatics · Sentence · Sociology · Subject (documents · Swahili · Computer Science · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Multilingual Education and Policy · Psychology · Communication · History · Philosophy
Is Time Money, Is Argument War? Swahili Cultural Conceptualizations and Language Usage
Proverbial futures
New fashion “orientations”
What if…? Imagining non-Western perspectives on pragmatic theory and practice
Adolescent, caregiver and community experiences with a gender transformative, social emotional learning intervention
Dialectical Maga
Courtroom proverbial murals in Lebanon
Communicative action and interaction in Africa
Speaking Out
Zanzibari women’s discursive and sexual agency
African-Print Fashion Now! A Story of Taste, Globalization, and Style
Kanga Cloths at Vlisco
Overcoming discursive prohibitions in participatory media
The arrival of white women
Threads of Connection
Pronouncing & persevering
Using Language
Handbuch der Semiotik
Pragmatics of human communication
Verbale und non-verbale Kleiderkommunikation am Indischen Ozean (Swahili, Ostafrika)
The Way the World Is
Slaves, Spices and Ivory in Zanzibar
In Praise of Heroes
Dressing Up
Oral literature in Africa
Politeness
The Wisdom of Many
Analogic Ambiguity
From Slaves to Squatters. Plantation Labour and Agriculture in Zanzibar and Coastal Kenya, 1890-1925
Communicating with Quotes
Pronouncing and Persevering
Proverbs and the Ethnography of Speaking Folklore1
Situations That Lead to Disqualification
A Method for Scaling Verbal Disqualification
| Unique citing works | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,94 |
| Citation span | 2010 - 2025 (16) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 15 |