Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Vulnerability and its implications

Some comments in the light of the Strasbourg case law concerning asylum seekers

Bibliographic Data

ID21735643
AuthorsKatarzyna Galka (0000-0003-2532-6907, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume22
Issue2
Pages285-300
Publication date2021-12-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEspaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1519-5899 • E-ISSN: 2179-7943
PublisherUniversidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (PUBLISHER • BR)
DOI10.18593/ejjl.29950
OpenAlexW4226211139
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited7

A decade has passed since the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR/Court) for the first time recognized asylum seekers as ‘a particularly underprivileged and vulnerable population group in need of special protection’ (M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece, 2011). For many years this approach could be seen as forming a part of the Strasbourg paradigm with regard to the protection of rights and freedoms of foreigners seeking for international protection in States Parties to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Despite a noticeable shift within this paradigm (see especially Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary, 2019), vulnerability – although now on more individualized, in contrast to its group form, when the applicant's vulnerability is determined by belonging to a specific category of persons ‒ still have a role to play in the ECtHR’s assessments of responsibility of the respondent States with regard to the violations of the applicant's rights. Recognizing vulnerability as a normative category in the Strasbourg case law, thus as a qualification that produces concrete, legal effects for States’ obligations under the ECHR (which must be seen as a primary, overriding justification for its application by the Court), the present article examines the ECtHR’s references to vulnerability of asylum seekers, explaining the structure of this argument (how and to what extent it is applied, on what grounds), with a special focus on the legal consequences associated to it in the light of the Strasbourg case law

Convention · Human rights · Normative · Political science · Population · Refugee · Respondent · Sociology · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection · Healthcare Systems and Practices · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration

  • Incomplete protection

    Open Access•Mohammad Al-Fawareh, Ghofran Hilal et al.•Cogent Social Sciences•2026

  • Vulnerable groups

    Lourdes Peroni, Alexandra Timmer•International Journal of…•2013

  • The Protection of Vulnerable Groups under International Human Rights Law

    Ingrid Nifosi-Sutton•Protection of Vulnerable Groups…•2017

  • Asylum Seekers in Europe

    G Clayton•Human Rights Law Review•2011

  • The human rights of the vulnerable

    Dimitris Xenos•The International Journal of…•2009

  • Facing the challenge of migratory vulnerability in the European Court of Human Rights

    Open Access•Moritz Baumgärtel•Netherlands Quarterly of Human…•2020

  • The Creativity of the European Court of Human Rights

    Andrew Mowbray•Human Rights Law Review•2005

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae