Science-Brokers or Sense-Givers
How Experts Participate in Public Crisis Communication on Social Media
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21738367 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Xue Lin (0000-0002-9768-4992, Nanjing University), Hengqin Wu (0000-0002-0925-2293, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2025-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Natural Hazards Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1527-6988 • E-ISSN: 1527-6996 |
| Publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-2211 |
| OpenAlex | W4407895455 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 68 |
Although the participations of experts on social media are recognized as important in public crisis communication, research attention to exploring this phenomenon is still lacking. This research discussed the critical and instrumental approaches to expert participation in crisis communication while arguing that a sensemaking approach is more appropriate due to the decentralized and interactive characteristics of social media. This study employed a quantitative content analysis by coding 917 Weibo trending posts by expert accounts during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings show that experts on social media were mostly grassroot professionals who played irreplaceable roles in making sense of crises in the early phase when the crisis signals are uncertain and ambiguous. Additionally, this study identified four different participation styles, including the science-brokers, opinion-expressers, information-transmitters, and sense-givers. The majority of the experts in the case acted as opinion-expressers by raising critiques and comments instead of as science-brokers who explain the latest scientific findings. Discussions ensued on the significance of moving away from a simplistic view and embracing the dynamics and diversity of expert participation in crisis communication in the social media era
Advertising · Business · Crisis communication · Media studies · Political science · Public relations · Social media · Sociology · Disaster Management and Resilience · Media Studies and Communication · Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Designs on Nature
The value of communication during a crisis
Lack of Trust, Conspiracy Beliefs, and Social Media Use Predict Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy
Covid-19
Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication as an Integrative Model
Examining the Role of Social Media in Effective Crisis Management
The Evolving Field of Risk Communication
The first eight months of Sweden’s Covid‐19 strategy and the key actions and actors that were involved
Risk Communication for Public Health Emergencies
Best Practices in Crisis Communication
Mapping crisis communication in the communication research
How the crisis of trust in experts occurs on social media in China? Multiple-case analysis based on data mining
The role of emotion and social connection during the Covid-19 pandemic phase transitions
Experts in emergencies
Experts in crisis
Tweeting about mental health to honor Carrie Fisher
Open science communication
Fostering public trust in science
Credibility and trust in risk communication
The Honest Broker
Hiding in Plain Sight
The causes and consequences of Covid-19 misperceptions
The Logic of Practice
Expert-Led Securitization
Weibo and the making of Chinese networked publics
The Third Wave of Science Studies
Paths to trust
Explaining science-led policy-making
Anti-intellectualism and the mass public’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic
Risk society
Expert authority and support for Covid-19 measures in Germany and the UK
Expert knowledge and policymaking
Freezing deliberation through public expert advice
Establishing Trust in Experts During a Crisis
Policy analysis, science and politics
Power structure among the actors of financial support to the poor to access health services
A Plague on Politics? The Covid Crisis, Expertise, and the Future of Legitimation
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |