Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Discrete-Outcome Analysis of Tornado Damage Following the 2011 Tuscaloosa, Alabama, Tornado

Bibliographic Data

ID21738555
AuthorsShane Crawford (0000-0003-3848-1447, University of Alabama, corresponding author), Alexander M Hainen (0000-0003-1138-9739, University of Alabama), Andrew J Graettinger (0000-0002-1858-2307, University of Alabama), John W van de Lindt (0000-0001-6386-4509, Colorado State University), Lawrence Powell (0000-0002-8673-7358, University of Alabama)
Year2020
Volume21
Issue4
Publication date2020-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueNatural Hazards Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1527-6988 • E-ISSN: 1527-6996
PublisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000396
OpenAlexW3045866287
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited40

Ground-truth measurements of damage caused by natural disasters are routinely used to determine which factors of the natural, built, and social environment contribute to losses from these events. Process-based models, which are based on structural design and probability theory, are often used in engineering risk analysis to predict damage and subsequent losses from these events, but empirical modeling can effectively aid in capturing the partial contribution of the factors of each of these interconnected environments leading to measured damage outcomes. An empirical assessment of tornado damage in a sample area of Tuscaloosa, Alabama, was conducted using satellite imagery collected at multiple time steps after the tornado and each building in the sample was assigned one of three damage outcomes: unaffected, damaged, or destroyed. Tornado event, building, and socioeconomic data were obtained for the sample area, and a deep learning approach based on satellite imagery was used to measure the amount of pretornado tree cover near each building in the study area. Multiple discrete-outcome modeling frameworks were tested to measure the partial effects of community characteristics leading to damage outcomes. Results show that combining publicly available imagery and deep learning approaches can produce more robust empirical models that would aid in identifying physically vulnerable locations within communities and produce more risk-informed decision-making

Built environment · Civil engineering · Geography · Meteorology · Natural disaster · Natural hazard · Tornado · Computer Science · Engineering · Environmental Science · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research · Wind and Air Flow Studies

  • Examining Tornado Vulnerability in Kansas with Recent Findings from an EF4 Tornado

    Elaina J Sutley, Jae H Kim et al.•Natural Hazards Review•2021

  • Predicting tornado-induced building damage

    Open Access•Danrong Zhang, Nimisha Roy et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2025

  • Towards reliable deep learning for post-disaster damage Assessment

    Open Access•Umut Lagap, Saman Ghaffarian et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2025

  • Assessing vulnerability of rural buildings to tornadoes and their relationships with building attributes and surrounding land uses

    Open Access•Xuanmei Yang, Kai-Fa Lu et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2026

  • Tornado-Induced Structural Damage Based on Reconnaissance Surveys of the 2019 Jefferson City, Missouri, Tornado and Previous Notable Tornadoes

    Ryan Honerkamp, Guirong Yan et al.•Natural Hazards Review•2022

  • A latent class model for discrete choice analysis

    Open Access•William H Greene, David A Hensher•Transportation Research Part B:…•2003

  • Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model

    Jerry A Hausman, Jerry Hausman et al.•Econometrica•1984

  • Multinomial Logit Specification Tests

    Kenneth A Small, Cheng Hsiao•International Economic Review•1985

  • Deep learning

    Open Access•Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio et al.•Nature•2015

  • Disasters by Design

    Dennis S Mileti, A Joseph Henry Press book et al.•Disasters by Design•1999

  • Testing for Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives

    Open Access•Tim R L Fry, M Harris et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•1998

  • Testing for IIA in the Multinomial Logit Model

    Open Access•Simon Cheng, J Scott Long•Sociological Methods & Research•2007

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae