Inclusive Emergency Alerts
Exploring Whether Agencies Are Ready, Willing, and Able
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21738568 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Carson MacPherson-Krutsky (0000-0003-1391-3469, University of Colorado Boulder), Mary Angelica Painter (0000-0002-0910-5365, University of Colorado Boulder), Melissa Villarreal (0000-0003-0690-5612, US Forest Service) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Natural Hazards Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1527-6988 • E-ISSN: 1527-6996 |
| Publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-2400 |
| OpenAlex | W4415649026 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 32 |
Emergency alerting—the process of sending information to communities rapidly during a crisis or disaster event—received heightened attention in the United States in the past decade. As disasters increase in frequency and intensity, news media, the public, and government officials exposed issues with the ability of authorities to warn people with limited English proficiency (LEP) and people with auditory or visual disabilities. However, little research examines the extent to which current emergency alerting policies align with best practices for reaching these populations. In this case study, we explore the feasibility of operationalizing the Ready, Willing, and Able (RWA) framework to examine emergency alerting systems in Colorado. We tested the feasibility of the RWA framework by developing benchmark statements for each construct from the research literature on inclusive emergency alerting. We then conducted a statewide survey of alerting authorities and held a series of partner meetings to assess the benchmarks and overall capability of emergency alerting systems to send inclusive alerts. We find that the RWA framework was a valuable tool for organizing insights of a complex system, but that more refinement is needed to operationalize it to assess alert and warning systems. We argue that although many alerting authorities are willing to expand their alerts into other languages and formats to reach diverse audiences, the extent to which they are ready and able is limited and mixed. We identify barriers to providing accessible alerts that include the patchwork nature of alert systems, a lack of standard processes, resource constraints, technological limitations, a lack of training, and a lack of public awareness. These barriers are especially significant for rural and resource constrained communities. Policy change is needed to ensure emergency alerting practices are more inclusive and reach populations who are most at-risk
Best practice · Emergency management · Operationalization · Warning system · Disaster Management and Resilience · Library Science and Administration · Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Proposed Model of the Relationship of Risk Information Seeking and Processing to the Development of Preventive Behaviors
Communication of emergency public warnings
Milling and Public Warnings
Barriers and best practices for inclusive emergency alerts and warnings
Deaf-led organizations and disaster communication in Việt Nam
Silent no more
Applying a person-centred capability framework to inform targeted action on Disability Inclusive Disaster Risk Reduction
Recommendations for increasing the reach and effectiveness of heat risk education and warning messaging
Systemic Vulnerabilities in Hispanic and Latinx Immigrant Communities Led to the Reliance on an Informal Warning System in the December 10–11, 2021, Tornado Outbreak
Ember Alerts
Hazard Warning Systems
How do you warn them if they speak only Spanish? Challenges for organizations in communicating risk to Colonias residents in Texas, USA
Crisis translation
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |