Examining prosecutorial decision‐making in plea bargaining
An experimental paradigm in a community sample
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21739529 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ashley M Votruba (0000-0001-7836-2042, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, corresponding author), Casey N Tisdale (0000-0001-7537-5876, University of Nebraska–Lincoln) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 595-620 |
| Publication date | 2021-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1529-7489 • E-ISSN: 1530-2415 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/asap.12234 |
| OpenAlex | W3128650790 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 63 |
Scholars estimate that 90–95% of guilty pleas are the result of plea bargaining and there is a growing body of empirical research on plea bargain decision‐making. We use a new experimental paradigm that mimics prosecutors’ actual decision‐making processes to examine factors that influence plea bargaining decisions. Participants received a casefile detailing a theft from an electronics store. This casefile—fabricated to reflect one a prosecutor would actually receive—included a police report, witness statements, and a criminal history report. In these materials, we manipulated the defendant's motive, the severity of the crime, and the defendant's criminal history and measured the impact of these factors on participants’ decisions to offer a plea and the severity of the plea offers—operationalized as sentence offer length. The results indicated that the vast majority of the participants initially decided to offer a plea. The severity of the crime (operationalized as value of the theft) and defendant's criminal history impacted plea decisions, such that higher severity and a criminal history of theft increased the length of the sentence offer. Contrary to our hypothesis, the defendant's motive had no effect on plea offers. These results parallel current sentencing practices codified in law. Policy implications are discussed
Criminal procedure · Criminology · Epistemology · Operationalization · Plea · Political science · Sentence · Witness · Computer Science · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Psychology · Social Psychology
Charging and Plea Bargaining Practices under Determinate Sentencing
Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research
Prosecutorial Discretion and the Imposition of Mandatory Minimum Sentences
Reassessing and Redirecting Research on Race and Sentencing
Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method
Prosecuting Intimate Partner Sexual Assault
Deciphering the guilty plea
The influence of confessions on guilty pleas and pleadiscounts
Risk and resources
Unpacking gender and racial/ethnic biases in the federal sentencing of drug offenders
Displaced discretion under Ohio sentencing guidelines
The Impact of the Ethnicity and Gender of Defendants on the Decision to Reject or Dismiss Felony Charges
An Explicit Test of Plea Bargaining in the “Shadow of the Trial”
Criminality, Prosecutorial Screening, and Uncertainty
Remand for Plea. Bail Decisions and Plea Bargaining as Commensurate Decisions
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Successful Qualitative Research
Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment
Culpable causation
Understanding guilty pleas through the lens of social science
Lay judgments about child custody after divorce
The Deserving Worker
Is plea bargaining a rational choice? Plea bargaining as an engine of racial stratification and overcrowding in the United States prison system
Socialpsychological Processes Underlying Attitudes Toward Legal Punishment
Prosecutorial Discretion
Probability Discounting of Legal and non-Legal Scenarios
An Integration of Theories to Explain Judicial Discretion
Examining the Sources of Racial Bias in Potentially Capital Cases
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |