Custody Judgments, Ex‐offender Parents, and Best Interests of the Child
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21739560 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Julie Wertheimer (0000-0002-3293-0515, University of Nebraska–Lincoln), Richard L Wiener (University of Nebraska–Lincoln, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 230-263 |
| Publication date | 2020-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1529-7489 • E-ISSN: 1530-2415 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/asap.12199 |
| OpenAlex | W3008894573 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 31 |
One collateral consequence of a criminal conviction for parents with young children is the loss of custody, which turns on the subjective “best interests of the child” standard. This research explored whether criminal conviction and substance abuse history influenced custody decisions. Experiment 1 presented community participants with a vignette describing a parent with combinations of manipulated stigmatized characteristics (i.e., gender, race, offender status, and substance abuse). Participants completed a custody determination scale, which showed that mothers with an offense received more favorable custody decisions than fathers with an offense, as did ex‐offenders without substance abuse. Experiment 2 added a positive or negative psychological fitness evaluation of the ex‐offender. It found main effects of the professional parenting evaluation and replicated the parent's substance abuse findings from Experiment 1, but not the offense status result. Most importantly, these results were significant after controlling for the participants’ ratings of the best interests of the child in question and mediation analyses revealed that the child's best interests only partially explained the relationships between substance abuse, the parental evaluation, and the custody determination. This suggests that participants made custody decisions based on factors extraneous to the current legal standard, namely, the best interests of the child
Best interests · Child custody · Collateral · Conviction · Criminal Conviction · Criminology · Mediation · Political science · Psychiatry · Substance abuse · Vignette · Child Abuse and Trauma · Clinical Psychology · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
Stigma and substance use disorders
Nowhere to go
Medical marijuana laws in 50 states
Caring, Control, and Clinicians' Influence
G*Power 3
Amazon's Mechanical Turk
Securing Children’s Best Interests While Resisting the Lure of Simple Solutions
What Does the Wonderlic Personnel Test Measure
The functional relation between social inequality, criminal stereotypes, and public attitudes toward punishment of crime
Freedom now or a future later
Multiple stigma and Aids
Normalization and Legitimation
The Language of Stigmatization and the Mark of Violence
Complementary Justice
A model of (often mixed) stereotype content
Exoffender housing stigma and discrimination
If you judge, investigate! Responsibility reduces confirmatory information processing in legal experts
Lay judgments about child custody after divorce
Demand Effects in Survey Experiments
Substance Use, Policy, and Foster Care
Conceptualizing Stigma
The Mark of a Criminal Record
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |