Risks and Realities of Working with Alienated Children
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21739821 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard A Warshak (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 432-455 |
| Publication date | 2020-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Family Court Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1531-2445 • E-ISSN: 1744-1617 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/fcre.12481 |
| OpenAlex | W3023694481 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
Involvement in custody cases that include accusations of parental alienation—whether as an evaluator, expert witness, lawyer, judge, therapist, provider of a specialized intervention, or researcher—incurs both professional and personal risks. Some risks relate to false negative or false positive identifications of parental alienation that can lead to regulatory agency complaints and public condemnation by the parent who feels wronged by the case outcome. Other risks stem from providing services in an emerging area of practice and working with children who overtly oppose repairing the relationship with their rejected parent. These risks include: unfounded accusations of mistreating children; negatively biased commentary and sensationalist attacks in the media and in social media, professional conferences and journals, and in courtroom testimony; harassment, vilification, and invasion of privacy; threats of violence and public humiliation; shunning and rumor spreading by colleagues; and complaints to regulatory agencies. This article examines circumstances, beliefs, and dynamics that give rise to these risks, suggests precautions to reduce the risk of false accusations against professionals, and offers recommendations for dealing with regulatory agencies. Criticisms that a court or service provider has mistreated a child merit careful scrutiny in the context of the case evidence and empirical data. While some interventions for alienated children raise legitimate concerns, others have been maligned by anecdotal complaints that studies show do not represent the experience of most participants
Alienation · Criminology · Denial · Expert witness · False accusation · Harassment · Humiliation · Misappropriation · Political science · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Public relations · Scrutiny · Sensationalism · Sociology · Witness · Child Welfare and Adoption · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |