Democratic Norms, Social Projection, and False Consensus in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21743834 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Aaron C Weinschenk (0000-0002-2278-0349, University of Wisconsin–Green Bay), Costas Panagopoulos (0000-0002-8460-0331, Northeastern University, corresponding author), Sander Van Der Linden (0000-0002-0269-1744, University of Cambridge) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Pages | 255-268 |
| Publication date | 2021-10-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Political Marketing (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1537-7857 • E-ISSN: 1537-7865 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/15377857.2021.1939568 |
| OpenAlex | W3184909312 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 29 |
We examine individuals’ views about democratic norm violations related to the peaceful transfer of power and acceptance of election results and the link between those views and broader perceptions about support for social election norms in the American public. Using data from an original national survey fielded after the 2020 presidential election, a number of important findings emerge. First, sizable majorities of Americans personally support the peaceful transfer of power (89%) and accept the 2020 presidential election results (74%). Second, individuals perceive these social norms to be widely held by the public. Respondents believe that 67% of Americans support a peaceful transfer of power and that 63% of Americans will accept the results of the 2020 election. Third, there is a strong link between personal views about these election norms and social perceptions about election norms. Consistent with research in psychology on the false consensus bias, people expect the public at large to share their views about election norms. Finally, we demonstrate that political ideology moderates the relationship between personal views about election norms and public perceptions about these norms. Among conservatives who do not support the election outcome, the perception is that only a small portion of the general public supports the election. On the other hand, among conservatives who do support election norms, the perception is that a large share of the public shares their views
Democracy · General election · Ideology · Perception · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Primary election · Public opinion · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Liars know they are lying
Embeddedness, Social Contagion, and Vote Choice in the 2022 U.S. Senate Elections
Partisan identity, ideological orientations, and the differential criticisms of ingroup and outgroup leadership
Nos braços da maioria silenciosa
Election-Related Post-Traumatic Stress
Conspiracy beliefs and majority influence
Health and Election Outcomes
It’s About Hate
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Follow the Leader?
Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms
The Effect of a Supreme Court Decision Regarding Gay Marriage on Social Norms and Personal Attitudes
Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students.
Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation
The Reasoning Voter
Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect
Norm Perception as a Vehicle for Social Change
What Underlies the False Consensus Effect? How Personal Opinion and Disagreement Affect Perception of Public Opinion
President Donald J. Trump
The false consensus effect
The “false consensus effect”
Public Beliefs About the Beliefs of the Public
False Consensus Goes Online
Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings from a 2010 Multi-Mode Comparison
Searching for Bright Lines in the Trump Presidency
The Trump Presidency and American Democracy
Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making
The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates
Differential construal and the false consensus effect
Scientific agreement can neutralize politicization of facts
Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias
How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |