Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Democratic Norms, Social Projection, and False Consensus in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election

Bibliographic Data

ID21743834
AuthorsAaron C Weinschenk (0000-0002-2278-0349, University of Wisconsin–Green Bay), Costas Panagopoulos (0000-0002-8460-0331, Northeastern University, corresponding author), Sander Van Der Linden (0000-0002-0269-1744, University of Cambridge)
Year2021
Volume20
Issue3-4
Pages255-268
Publication date2021-10-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Political Marketing (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1537-7857 • E-ISSN: 1537-7865
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/15377857.2021.1939568
OpenAlexW3184909312
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited29

We examine individuals’ views about democratic norm violations related to the peaceful transfer of power and acceptance of election results and the link between those views and broader perceptions about support for social election norms in the American public. Using data from an original national survey fielded after the 2020 presidential election, a number of important findings emerge. First, sizable majorities of Americans personally support the peaceful transfer of power (89%) and accept the 2020 presidential election results (74%). Second, individuals perceive these social norms to be widely held by the public. Respondents believe that 67% of Americans support a peaceful transfer of power and that 63% of Americans will accept the results of the 2020 election. Third, there is a strong link between personal views about these election norms and social perceptions about election norms. Consistent with research in psychology on the false consensus bias, people expect the public at large to share their views about election norms. Finally, we demonstrate that political ideology moderates the relationship between personal views about election norms and public perceptions about these norms. Among conservatives who do not support the election outcome, the perception is that only a small portion of the general public supports the election. On the other hand, among conservatives who do support election norms, the perception is that a large share of the public shares their views

Democracy · General election · Ideology · Perception · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Primary election · Public opinion · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Liars know they are lying

    Open Access•Lewandowsky, Ullrich K H Ecker et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Embeddedness, Social Contagion, and Vote Choice in the 2022 U.S. Senate Elections

    Open Access•Costas Panagopoulos, Nunzio Lore•Journal of Political Marketing•2024

  • Partisan identity, ideological orientations, and the differential criticisms of ingroup and outgroup leadership

    Open Access•Joseph A Wagoner, Yani Yakob•Analyses of Social Issues and…•2025

  • Nos braços da maioria silenciosa

    Open Access•Wilson Da Silva Gomes, Wilson Gomes•Galáxia (São Paulo•2025

  • Election-Related Post-Traumatic Stress

    Open Access•Tamsyn Fraser, Costas Panagopoulos et al.•Politics and the Life Sciences•2023

  • Conspiracy beliefs and majority influence

    Open Access•Lotte Pummerer, Lukas Fock et al.•The Journal of Social Psychology•2024

  • Health and Election Outcomes

    Open Access•Costas Panagopoulos, Aaron C Weinschenk•Political Research Quarterly•2022

  • It’s About Hate

    Open Access•James A Piazza, Natalia Van Doren•American Politics Research•2023

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • Follow the Leader?

    Gabriel S Lenz•Follow the leader?•2012

  • Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms

    Open Access•Katherine Clayton, Nicholas T Davis et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2021

  • The Effect of a Supreme Court Decision Regarding Gay Marriage on Social Norms and Personal Attitudes

    Open Access•Margaret Tankard, Margaret E Tankard et al.•Psychological Science•2017

  • Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students.

    John S Baer, Alan W Stacy et al.•Journal of Studies on Alcohol and…•1991

  • Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation

    Open Access•John T Jost, Sander Van Der Linden et al.•Current Opinion in Psychology•2018

  • The Reasoning Voter

    Samuel L Popkin•The Reasoning Voter•1991

  • Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect

    Gary Marks, Gary N Marks et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1987

  • Norm Perception as a Vehicle for Social Change

    Open Access•Margaret Tankard, Elizabeth Levy Paluck•Social Issues and Policy Review•2016

  • What Underlies the False Consensus Effect? How Personal Opinion and Disagreement Affect Perception of Public Opinion

    Magdalena Wojcieszak, Vincent Price•International Journal of Public…•2009

  • President Donald J. Trump

    Open Access•Diana Panke, Ulrich Petersohn•International Journal Canada s…•2017

  • The false consensus effect

    Open Access•Brian Mullen, Jennifer L Atkins et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1985

  • The “false consensus effect”

    Open Access•Lee Ross, David Greene et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1977

  • Public Beliefs About the Beliefs of the Public

    James M Fields, Howard Schuman•Public Opinion Quarterly•1976

  • False Consensus Goes Online

    Magdalena Wojcieszak•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

  • Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings from a 2010 Multi-Mode Comparison

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Brian F Schaffner et al.•Political Analysis•2014

  • Searching for Bright Lines in the Trump Presidency

    Open Access•John Michael Carey, Gretchen Helmke et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2019

  • The Trump Presidency and American Democracy

    Open Access•Robert C Lieberman, Suzanne Mettler et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2019

  • Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making

    Richard R Lau, David P Redlawsk•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates

    Wendy M Rahn•American Journal of Political…•1993

  • Differential construal and the false consensus effect

    Thomas Gilovich•Journal of Personality and Social…•1990

  • Scientific agreement can neutralize politicization of facts

    Open Access•Sander Van Der Linden, Anthony Leiserowitz et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2017

  • Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias

    Open Access•Arthur Lupia•American Political Science Review•1994

  • How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Erik Peterson et al.•American Political Science Review•2013

Citations per year2
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae