Human and Alienating Work
What Sex Worker Advocates Can Teach Catholic Social Thought
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21744348 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kate Ward (0000-0003-1422-7938, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 261-278 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1540-7942 • E-ISSN: 2326-2176 |
| Publisher | Philosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5840/jsce2021112952 |
| OpenAlex | W3215447042 |
| Language | EN |
In Catholic social thought (CST), work that is exploitative, immoral, or hopelessly monotonous can be labeled alienating: its performance makes the worker a stranger to her own, God-given human nature. CST traditionally understands sex work, which directs the human sexual faculties to ends other than the unitive and procreative, as a paradigmatic example of alienating work, and this paper will not disagree. Instead, I will show how accepting sex worker advocates’ claim that “sex work is work” reveals that while sex work is indeed alienating by CST’s standards, many forms of paid work available today are alienating in similar ways. Listening to sex worker advocates helps CST strengthen its critique of alienating work while acknowledging sex workers’ moral agency
Active listening · Epistemology · Political science · Sex work · Social science · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment · Social Psychology · Social Work
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |