Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Troeltsch Today

A Response to Sarah Coakley

Bibliographic Data

ID21744451
AuthorsGerald McKenny (corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume44
Issue2
Pages261-266
Publication date2024-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the Society of Christian Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1540-7942 • E-ISSN: 2326-2176
PublisherPhilosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.5840/jsce2024813109
OpenAlexW4401592971
LanguageEN

Ernst Troeltsch’s influential typology of church, sect, and mystical remains a useful way of classifying forms of Christian social ethics today. However, his assumptions about what it means for Christian social ethics to influence society make it difficult for his typology to recognize or explain many of the achievements of Christian social ethics since his death, including those of William Temple, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, and Howard Thurman. Nevertheless, Sarah Coakley demonstrates the profitability of the typology for tracking the relationships between Christology, ethics, and social contexts. I close by considering how Temple, Bonhoeffer, and Thurman fare in holding these three aspects together

Epistemology · Karl Barth and Christian Theology · Philosophy · Reformed Theology and Governance · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae