Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Catholic Teaching on Slavery

Consistency or Development

Bibliographic Data

ID21746592
AuthorsRoger Bergman (corresponding author)
EditorsCheryl Handel, Kathleen Shields (0000-0002-2677-4253)
Year2022
Volume19
Issue2
Pages231-250
Publication date2022-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Catholic Social Thought (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1548-0712 • E-ISSN: 2153-9979
PublisherPhilosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.5840/jcathsoc202219217
OpenAlexW4312374782
LanguageEN

In Fratelli tutti, Pope Francis wonders why it took the Church so long to condemn slavery unequivocally. Indeed, the place of slavery in Catholic teaching provides a test case of change in official Church intellectual tradition. This paper examines the divergent arguments of four authors who have written about Church teaching on slavery: Pope Leo XIII, Fr. Joel S. Panzer, Judge John T. Noonan Jr., and Fr. John Francis Maxwell. It considers the statement on slavery in the Catechism of the Catholic Church in light of Pope John Paul II’s meditation on the nature of human labor in Laborem exercens, itself a meditation on Leo’s Rerum novarum (On the Condition of Labor), and offers a critique of the position that papal teaching, because it must be self-consistent, is therefore irreformable or unsusceptible to development. This provides one response to the pope’s provocative question

Catechism · Meditation · Papal infallibility · Theology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Classics · History · Philosophy · Religious Freedom and Discrimination · Religious studies · Theology and Canon Law Studies

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae