Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Managerial prerogative, property rights, and labor control in employment status disputes

Bibliographic Data

ID21749983
AuthorsJulia Tomassetti (0000-0002-6345-0637, City University of Hong Kong, corresponding author), Julia Louise Tomassetti (City University of Hong Kong School of Law , Kowloon Tong , Hong Kong)
Year2023
Volume24
Issue1
Pages180-205
Publication date2023-01-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheoretical Inquiries in Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1565-1509 • E-ISSN: 1565-3404
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/til-2023-0010
OpenAlexW4321602777
LanguageEN
Citations received1

This Article explores how managerial prerogative shapes disputes over employment classification and reveals a neglected but prominent feature in legal arguments about platform worker rights—the disputed relevance of a platform’s intellectual property rights. In classification disputes, instead of denying that it has a right to control how others perform services for it, the company often concedes its employer-like authority but offers an alternative rationale: managerial prerogative. The company argues, and judges often agree, that its labor control is not the exercise of employer authority but instead reflects a prerogative of enterprise ownership, like a right to protect property and determine product lines. Thus, managerial prerogative both explains labor control and exempts that control from the statutory duties that would otherwise attach under the legal tests. Platform companies appear to have taken notice of such cases and designed their work relationships around property-based rationales. For instance, Uber uses a software “license” in which drivers agree to Uber’s authority as a condition for accessing the app. The license depicts the terms upon which drivers must affirmatively cooperate with Uber to produce transportation as simply the negative duties not to interfere with Uber’s intellectual property. The Article concludes that we must reject appeals to managerial prerogative in employment classification disputes. To assume that a property-based rationale for labor control is inconsistent with employment is to misunderstand the legal basis of employment and the purpose of statutory labor law. The appeals also rely on dubious economic assumptions and conflate property rights with agreements about the use of property

Business · Economics · Law and economics · License · Management · Political science · Politics · Prerogative · Property rights · Statutory law · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Digital Transformation in Law · Law · Law, AI, and Intellectual Property

  • The robots strike back? Industrial action, automation and the mediating role of institutions in Europe

    Open Access•Toon Van Overbeke•Transfer European Review of…•2026

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae