Rhetoric and psychology
The interdisciplinary challenge of conspiracy theories
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21750046 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lucie Donckier de Donceel (University of Palermo, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Argumentation et analyse du discours (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1565-8961 • E-ISSN: 1565-8961 |
| Publisher | OpenEdition (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4000/12hvr |
| OpenAlex | W4403706647 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 19 |
Conspiracy theories are now central to our democratic societies, the academic world, and civil society. All seem to agree that we should be able to prevent the presence and spread of conspiracy theories in the public sphere. While this objective is generally recognized, the way to achieve it remains unclear. Like others, we believe that interdisciplinarity is one possible answer. However, this path presents several challenges, the first of which is mutual understanding. In this article, we examine the book of Iacone, Loria, and Meini on conspiracy (2023), to show how the psychological and rhetorical approaches to conspiracy theories can dialogue and understand each other
Epistemology · Linguistics · Psychoanalysis · Rhetoric · Social science · Sociology · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Psychology
A Culture of Conspiracy
Régimes de rationalité, post-vérité et conspirationnisme
“Superstition ain’t the way”. The Optimism of the Conspiracy Theorist
What is so special about conspiracy theories? Conceptually distinguishing beliefs in conspiracy theories from conspiracy beliefs in psychological research
Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories
Pour une neutralité engagée
| Highly cited | No |
|---|