Rhetorical Strategies of Counteracting Conspiracy-based Dissent on Covid-19 Vaccines
The #ThinkBeforeSharing Institutional Campaign
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21750155 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Roberta Martina Zagarella (0000-0001-8012-2451, CID Ethics-CNR, Rome (Italy)), Marco Annoni (0000-0003-3259-1856, CID Ethics-CNR, Rome (Italy)) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Argumentation et analyse du discours (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1565-8961 • E-ISSN: 1565-8961 |
| Publisher | OpenEdition (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4000/12hvo |
| OpenAlex | W4403706804 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 25 |
This paper aims to explore how institutions may counteract conspiracy theories using appropriate discursive resources. We use a rhetorical approach to analyze the first European information campaign launched in 2020 to counteract conspiracy theories about COVID-19 vaccines. On this basis, we advance a series of practical recommendations for institutions to counteract conspiracy theories through information campaigns
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Biology · Dissent · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Rhetorical question · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Internal Medicine · Virology
The Pandemic of Argumentation
La présentation de soi
The epic battle against coronavirus misinformation and conspiracy theories
Régimes de rationalité, post-vérité et conspirationnisme
Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories
Conspiracy Theories
Conspiracy Beliefs, Rejection of Vaccination, and Support for hydroxychloroquine
Nasa Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax
Conspiracy Theories
Ethos and Pragmatics
Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning
The Third-Person Effect in Communication
Bad News
| Highly cited | No |
|---|