Contribuições ao debate sobre a avaliação da produção científica no Brasil

Bibliographic Data

ID21773409
AuthorsCadernos de Saúde Pública (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz), Ciências Saúde – Manguinhos História (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz), Informação e Inovação em Saúde Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz), Revista Fitos (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz), Educação e Saúde Trabalho (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz), Ciência & Tecnologia Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz)
Year2020
Volume18
Issue1
Publication date2020-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTrabalho Educação e Saúde (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1678-1007 • E-ISSN: 1981-7746
PublisherFapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1590/1981-7746-sol00244
OpenAlexW4236355238
SciELOS1981-77462020000100200
LanguagePT
References cited3

In the reviewing of the procedures of the assessment of graduate studies programs, the Assessment Division of the Brazilian Graduate Studies Coordinating Board (Capes) has established new criteria for classifying scientific journals in the 'Qualis Journals' system (Memorandum n. 6/2019-CGAP/DAV/CAPES). The methodology proposes a unique reference classification for journals ('Qualis nico'), based on the combined use of the bibliometric indicators CiteScore (Scopus), Impact Factor (Web of Science), and h5 (Google Scholar). In the case of journals not indexed in Scopus and Web of Science, a regression model was fitted to establish the relationship between the h5 index and CiteScore. The classification is based on the percentile in which the journal is situated in each database, according to the thematic category. This percentile is divided into 8 groups (for each 12.5% of the total). It is possible to modify the classification of up to 30% of the journals in each area

Humanities · Political science · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Philosophy · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access