Ontario’s history of tampering and re-tampering with birth registration documents
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21778423 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lynn Gehl (Algonquin College, corresponding author), Lynn Gehl1 (Algonquin Anishinaabekwe) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 24-33 |
| Publication date | 2021-10-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | First Peoples Child & Family Review An Interdisciplinary Journal Honouring the Voices Perspectives and Knowledges of First Peoples (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1708-489X • E-ISSN: 2293-6610 |
| Publisher | Consortium Erudit (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.7202/1082440ar |
| OpenAlex | W4205703585 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
This article opens a discussion on the matter of Ontario administrators’, hospital and government employees’ history of tampering with long form birth registration documents in situations where birth mothers were unmarried or separated. Relying on Indigenous methods, such as listening to personal stories, and experts, the author explores how the practice of tampering with birth documents places Indigenous mothers and children in double jeopardy of not only being denied the information of who their biological father is or was, but also potentially being denied Indian status registration. Mothers and their children are deserving of more. This article ends with arguing additional research and funding are needed for a comprehensive understanding of the issue
Active listening · Biology · Criminology · Genealogy · Indigenous · Political science · Canadian Identity and History · Communication · History · Law · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |