Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Autobiographical Utopia of Natalia Romanovych-Tkachenko

Bibliographic Data

ID21780231
AuthorsLesia Demska-Budzuliak (0000-0003-3463-387X, corresponding author)
Year2023
Issue33
Pages59-64
Publication date2023-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Literary Studies Linguistics Folklore Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1728-2659 • E-ISSN: 2709-8494
PublisherTaras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (PUBLISHER • UA)
DOI10.17721/1728-2659.2023.33.09
OpenAlexW4362683828
LanguageEN
References cited1

The article is devoted to researching the work of N. Romanovych-Tkachenko, a representative of the generation of female writers of Soviet Ukraine in the 1920s, from the perspective of gender discourse. Women's literature of Soviet Ukraine in the 1920s-1930s is an understudied and not updated phenomenon of the Ukrainian literary process of that time. Most of the texts of women writers were unnoticed by literary critics, and the problems that were raised in their texts turned out to be "uninteresting" for the then, generally male, literary critics. Instead, we note the emergence of a new generation of women writers in Ukrainian literature, formed not only by the national tradition, but also by the first wave of European feminism. They radicalize the women's issue and put forward other, unlike their predecessors, aesthetic demands on artistic texts. At the same time, it was women writers who continued the traditions of modern Ukrainian literature, in particular bright individual writing. Most of them told the reader about their biographies for the first time in the form of memories, diaries, memoirs. The peculiarity of these biographies is that they reveal a striking discrepancy between the expectations of women from the gender policy of the Bolsheviks and the revolutionary, post-revolutionary reality. We can see two biographies of the writer by comparing the artistic texts and autobiographical memories of N. Romanovych-Tkachenko. One of them is imaginary, constructed by the author on the basis of her own life project, and the second is real, as the writer lived. These two biographies in different genre forms are presented in the writer's work. Imaginary biography is described in the experience of the characters of fictional texts, while real biography is represented by the memoir genre, in particular, the diaries and memoirs of the author. The difference between these two life scenarios shaped the feminist outlook of N. Romnovich-Tkachenko and many other modern women writers

Art · Art history · Epistemology · Feminism · Linguistics · Literary criticism · Literature · Memoir · Phenomenon · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · The Imaginary · Ukrainian · Utopia · Visual arts · Education and Social Development in Ukraine · Gender Studies · History · Military, Security, and Education Studies · Philosophy · Psychology

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae