Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Theories of Ethnogenesis as a Scientific Heritage

The Case of the Academic History of Yugra

Bibliographic Data

ID21780838
AuthorsGolovnev A (0000-0002-5716-655X, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume84
Issue3
Pages80-89
Publication date2024-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUral Historical Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1728-9718
PublisherInstitute of History and Archaeology of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Science (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.30759/1728-9718-2024-3(84)-80-89
OpenAlexW4402232099
LanguageEN

The scientific heritage includes, in addition to fundamental discoveries and significant achievements in the applied sciences, important discursive themes of research and knowledge opened by science for society, the so-called “eternal questions”. These include ethnogenesis, the place of which differs significantly in Russia and in the West. In domestic science, it has always been one of the priorities, and in foreign one it was considered as a peripheral subject. The reasons for this discrepancy are rooted in the circumstances of the formation of the sciences: Russian ethnography took shape in the 18th century, as knowledge about peoples, Western anthropology — in the 19th century, as knowledge about human and humanity. Approaches to genesis differ accordingly: in Russian ethnography it is the origin of peoples (ethnogenesis), in Western anthropology it is the origin of humans (anthropogenesis). The study of the origins of peoples became one of the first achievements of Russian ethno-studies in the 18th century, and in this sense, ethnogenesis can be valued as the original scientific tradition of Russian ethnography. During the crisis of ethnography in the USSR at the turn of the 1920–1930s ethnogenesis served as a refuge for ethnography, condemned to be written off from the category of sciences for its inability to integrate into the concept of Marxism. The “Era of Ethnogenesis” brought impressive results, ensuring the leadership of Soviet ethnography in the study of ethnogenesis and ethnohistory. This can also be read in the historiography of the ethnogenesis of the Uralic (including Ugric and Samoyed) peoples, recently summarized in the Academic History of Yugra. The author’s contribution to the ethnogenetic discussion can be considered the presentation of ethnogenesis not as the secession of peoples, but as the distribution of activity niches between them in a multiethnic community (ethnocenosis)

Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Ethnic group · Ethnogenesis · Sociology · Anthropology · Eurasian Exchange Networks · History · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae