The Afghan Peace Building Process
Problems and Prospects
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21781526 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Muhammad Azam (0000-0001-5405-8628, University of Sargodha, corresponding author), Arif Khan (0000-0001-7417-3981) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 94 |
| Issue | Summer |
| Pages | 1-16 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-26 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Central Asia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1729-9802 • E-ISSN: 2706-8102 |
| Publisher | Area Study Centre (Russia, China & Central Asia) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.54418/ca-94.216 |
| OpenAlex | W4405912499 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
At the beginning of the U.S.-Afghan war in 2001, none of the parties involved was willing to talk to each other. Over time, however, the need for peace negotiations became apparent, and a peace process slowly gained momentum in 2004. Although the Taliban militarily captured Kabul in 2021, one of the outcomes of the peace process was the Doha Peace Agreement signed by the United States and the Afghan Taliban, in which the latter guaranteed that they would not allow Afghan territory to be used against the United States. In addition, the peace process reached several milestones over the years. This article aims to analyze the achievements of the peace process in light of the web approach proposed by Lederach
Afghan · Political science · Process management · Programming language · Computer Science · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · Engineering · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Afghan Peace on the Horizon? An Examination of Public Opinion on the Ongoing Peace Talks
The Search for Legitimate Rule, Justice and a Durable Peace
Linking Provincial Reconstruction Teams to Security Enhancement in Afghanistan
Female Religious Actors as Peace Agents in Afghanistan
The Five Power Defence Arrangements and Defense Diplomacy in Southeast Asia
Toward a Sociological Imagination
Weaving the Web of Democracy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|