Syntax of the Uralic languages
Principal features and challenges. Introduction to the special issue of Esuka – Jeful
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21783068 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Maria Ovsjannikova (0000-0002-8313-0374, University of Potsdam), Fedor Rozhanskiy (0000-0003-1374-2663, University of Tartu) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-06-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1736-8987 • E-ISSN: 2228-1339 |
| Editora | University of Tartu (PUBLISHER • EE) |
| DOI | 10.12697/jeful.2024.15.1.01 |
| OpenAlex | W4400087098 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 32 |
This introductory paper presents the context and current challenges of Uralic syntactic studies. The brief summary of seven selected papers from the SOUL-4 conference published in the present issue is followed by an overview of six topics from the domain of Uralic syntax, namely: differential object marking; object agreement; impersonal constructions; the syntax of minor parts of speech; subordination and nonfinite predication; and possessive constructions. The aim of this overview is to show how intricate and, in some ways, how unfamiliar Uralic syntax looks from the Standard Average European perspective and how many issues still await further study. Kokkuvõte. Maria Ovsjannikova, Fedor Rozhanskiy: Uraali keelte süntaks: põhiomadused ja väljakutsed. Sissejuhatus. See sissejuhatav artikkel tutvustab Uurali süntaktiliste uuringute konteksti ja praeguseid väljakutseid. Esmalt tehakse lühikokkuvõte seitsmest SOUL-4 konverentsil ette kantud käesolevasse numbrisse valitud artiklist, millele järgneb ülevaade kuuest Uurali süntaksi valdkonna teemast, nimelt: diferentseeritud objekti markeerimine, objekti ühildumine, impersonaalsed konstruktsioonid, abisõnade süntaks, alistusseos ja mittefiniitne predikatsioon ning omastavate konstruktsioonide süntaks. Käesoleva ülevaate eesmärk on näidata, kui keeruline ja mitmes mõttes võõras on Uurali süntaks Euroopa keskmise standardi perspektiivist ning kui palju küsimusi ootab veel edasist uurimist
Linguistics · Possessive · Syntax · History · Linguistics and language evolution · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Case Alternations in Five Finnic Languages
The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages
The European linguistic area
Mordvin (Erzya and Moksha)
Case
A Grammar of Tundra Nenets
The Syntax of the Finnish Question Particle
Complementation
The Uralic Languages
Are main clauses really ‘main’ clauses? The case of relative clauses in spoken Estonian and Finnish
Syntax and functions of the Ingrian discourse particles no and nu
Syntax of the numeral phrase in Soikkola Ingrian
Impersonal or passive? Some approaches to analysis (based on the Veps and Estonian languages)
Conditional converb of the verb ‘say’ as a conditional marker in Forest Enets
Oblique and nominative nominal possessors in Forest Enets
Why partitive? Possible motivations for the partitive complement of Finnic adpositions
The Livonian Jussive
Multifunctionality and syncretism in non-finite forms
Discontinuous constituents or independent constructions
Encoding definiteness on pronominal objects in Mordvinic
“Compound verbs” in Komi
The Languages of the Soviet Union
Identifiability, givenness and zero-marked referential objects in Komi
Passives and impersonals
Nominal aspect, quantity, and time
A typological perspective on Differential Object Marking
Structural case in finnish
Cross-categorial scalar properties explaining Differential Object Marking
Partitive, genitive or nominative
What markedness marks
Pragmatic direct object Marking in Eastern Mansi
Secondary topic as a relation in information structure
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |