Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

School leaders’ expectations of AI’s impact on students and teachers

Insights from Icils 2023

Bibliographic Data

ID21784427
AuthorsNurullah Eryılmaz (0000-0003-1916-8295), Dana-Kristin Mah (0009-0004-2106-2216), Mehmet Şükrü Bellibaş (0000-0003-1281-4493), Michael Pietsch (0000-0002-9836-6793, corresponding author)
Year2025
Publication date2025-12-08
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducational Management Administration & Leadership (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1741-1432 • E-ISSN: 1741-1440
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/17411432251401487
OpenAlexW4417120467
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited82

This study examines how principals perceive the potential benefits and challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) for students’ learning and teachers’ work across 12 countries, utilizing data from the 2023 International Computer and Information Literacy Study (ICILS 2023). We utilized latent network models, which allow for a flexible, network-based understanding of latent constructs, to examine the structural relationships between variables related to principals’ perceptions of AI. The findings revealed that while many school leaders recognize AI's potential to enhance student engagement and support teaching, they also express worries about its impact on academic integrity, teacher workload, and instructional practices. Those who view AI as beneficial for students tend to see similar advantages for teachers, whereas concerns about increased workload often accompany negative perceptions of AI's role in education. These insights emphasize the importance of developing balanced AI integration strategies that optimize benefits while mitigating potential challenges for educators. We suggest that policymakers design professional learning opportunities for school leaders that address both the benefits and effective integration of AI in teaching and learning, as well as strategies to mitigate potential negative consequences, such as increased workload or unethical use (e.g. cheating)

Academic achievement · Literacy · Perception · Structural equation modeling · Survey data collection · Technology integration · Workload · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Online Learning and Analytics

  • How organizational support enhances teachers’ AI literacy

    Open Access•Jianfeng Fang, Mengting Qian•Interactive Learning Environments•2026

  • Leading collaborative innovation in schools

    Open Access•Mete Si̇pahi̇oğlu, Nurullah Eryılmaz et al.•Educational Management…•2026

  • Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students

    Open Access•Muhammad Abbas, Farooq Ahmed Jam et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • Investigating the performance of exploratory graph analysis and traditional techniques to identify the number of latent factors

    Open Access•Hudson Golino, Dingjing Shi et al.•Psychological Methods•2020

  • Students’ voices on generative AI

    Open Access•Cecilia K Y Chan, Wenjie Hu•International Journal of…•2023

  • Unpacking teachers’ intentions to integrate technology

    Open Access•Ronny Scherer, Timothy Teo•Educational Research Review•2019

  • A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education

    Open Access•Michael Bond, Hassan Khosravi et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • Generalized Network Psychometrics

    Open Access•Sacha Epskamp, Mijke Rhemtulla et al.•Psychometrika•2017

  • Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education

    Open Access•Andy Nguyen, Ha Ngan Ngo et al.•Education and Information…•2023

  • The technology acceptance model (TAM)

    Open Access•Rebeca Scherer, Ronny Scherer et al.•Computers & Education•2019

  • The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift.

    Richard P Bagozzi, Richard Bagozzi•Journal of the Association for…•2007

  • Exploratory graph analysis

    Open Access•Hudson F Golino, Hudson Golino et al.•PLoS ONE•2017

  • Organizing Schools for Improvement

    Open Access•Anthony S Bryk•Phi Delta Kappan•2010

  • Technology acceptance model

    Open Access•Nikola Marangunić, Andrina Granić•Universal Access in the…•2015

  • A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model

    Open Access•Jeroen Schepers, Martin Wetzels•Information & Management•2007

  • What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them

    Open Access•Thomas K F Chiu, Zubair Ahmad et al.•Computers and Education Open•2024

  • A Comparative Analysis of Community Detection Algorithms on Artificial Networks

    Open Access•Zhao Yang, René Algesheimer et al.•Scientific Reports•2016

  • Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis

    Open Access•Julian P T Higgins, Simon G Thompson•Statistics in Medicine•2002

  • Qgraph

    Open Access•Sacha Epskamp, Angélique O J Cramer et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2012

  • Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Fred D Davis•MIS Quarterly•1989

  • The Structure and Function of Complex Networks

    M Newman, M E J Newman•SIAM Review•2003

  • Digital transformation in education

    Open Access•Aidan McCarthy, Aidan Michael McCarthy et al.•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2023

  • Indifferent, skeptical, ambivalent, moderate, and enthusiastic

    Open Access•Jaehong Jang, Hawon Yoo et al.•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2024

  • How can educational innovations become sustainable? A review of the empirical literature

    Open Access•R Prenger, A P M Tappel et al.•Frontiers in Education•2022

  • Ethical use of ChatGPT in education—Best practices to combat AI-induced plagiarism

    Open Access•Attila Kővári•Frontiers in Education•2025

  • Support for generative artificial intelligence as a predictor of middle leaders’ generative artificial intelligence self-efficacy, valuing, and integration in school leadership work

    Open Access•Izhak Berkovich, Ori Eyal•Educational Management…•2025

  • Clipped wings

    Open Access•Reye•Educational Management…•2021

  • Affordances and challenges of artificial intelligence in K-12 education

    Helen Crompton, Mildred V Jones et al.•Journal of Research on Technology…•2024

  • Leading digital innovation in schools

    Open Access•Jasmin Witthöft, Burak Aydın et al.•Journal of Research on Technology…•2025

  • Unpacking the microfoundations of educational innovation and change

    Open Access•Michael Pietsch, Hilal Büyükgöze et al.•Public Management Review•2025

  • Artificial intelligence and school leadership

    Michael Fullan, Cecilia María Azorín-Abellán et al.•School Leadership and Management•2024

  • Perceptions and perspectives of Australian school leaders on the integration of artificial intelligence in schools

    Rebecca L Marrone, Samuel Fowler et al.•School Leadership and Management•2025

  • Undertaking practitioner research

    Alma Harris, Michelle Jones•School Leadership and Management•2024

  • Microfoundations of open innovation in schools

    Open Access•Jasmin Witthöft, Donnie Adams et al.•School Leadership and Management•2026

  • Comparing Methods for Factor Score Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling

    Jinying Ouyang, Zhehan Jiang et al.•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2024

  • Leading the AI transformation in schools

    Open Access•Michael Pietsch, Dana-Kristin Mah•Educational Technology Research…•2025

  • All the same or different? Revisiting measures of teachers' technology acceptance

    Open Access•Rebeca Scherer, Fazilat Siddiq et al.•Computers & Education•2020

  • Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies

    Open Access•Ruiqi Deng, Maoli Jiang et al.•Computers & Education•2025

  • Learning analytics in European higher education—Trends and barriers

    Open Access•Yi‐Shan Tsai, Diego Rates et al.•Computers & Education•2020

  • The roles of AI and educational leaders in AI-assisted administrative decision-making

    Open Access•Ruixun Dai, Matthew Krehl Edward Thomas et al.•The Australian Educational…•2025

  • ICT knowledge absorptive capacity

    Open Access•Sandra Fischer-Schöneborn, Chris Brown et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2026

  • Beware of metacognitive laziness

    Open Access•Yizhou Fan, Luzhen Tang et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2025

  • How school leadership and innovation shape instructional pathways to student achievement across nations

    Open Access•Burak Aydın, Marjolein Fokkema et al.•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2025

  • Preparing for Life in a Digital Age

    Open Access•Julian Fraillon, John Ainley et al.•Preparing for Life in a Digital Age•2014

  • The Gaussian Graphical Model in Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Data

    Sacha Epskamp, Lourens Waldorp et al.•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2018

  • The Promises and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Teachers

    Open Access•Ismail Celik, Muhterem Dindar et al.•TechTrends•2022

  • The Educational Affordances and Challenges of ChatGPT

    Open Access•Helen Crompton, Diane Burke•TechTrends•2024

  • Exploring integration aspects of school leadership in the context of digitalization and artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Antonios Kafa•International Journal of…•2025

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae