Contrasting the Reader Positioning Strategies in the Environmental Discourse of Greenpeace UK and Greenpeace France
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21784692 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul B White (0000-0002-6741-828X, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 75-97 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Linguistics and the Human Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1742-2906 • E-ISSN: 1743-1662 |
| Publisher | University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3138/lhs-2025-0005 |
| OpenAlex | W4410742110 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 25 |
This paper investigates the potential differences in the strategies of persuasion employed in activist campaign emails written in English and French. Developing recent work by Don (2019) and Peter White (2020a, 2020b, 2021a, 2021b), it seeks to highlight how the imagined reader is positioned as being at various levels of alignment and affiliation with the author. The analysis is based on a corpus comprising 50 campaign emails received from Greenpeace UK and Greenpeace France. While the two groups adopt similar attitudinal positions regarding environmental issues, they nevertheless can be distinguished in the role given to the imagined reader in the resolution of the campaign issue. More specifically, the texts can be characterized in terms of disparity of knowledge, experience, and capacity to act between writer and the reader-in-the-text (Thompson, 2012). The stance that the writer takes to the imagined reader is either “identifying” in the English emails, that is, between equals, or “authoritative” in the French emails, where the reader is limited to a supporting role. The analysis focuses on the use of markers of disclaim and concur, inclusive versus exclusive personal (pro)nominal groups, and a proposed cline of realization of commands directed toward the reader
Environmentalism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · History · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Law · Literacy, Media, and Education
Culture's consequences
The Language of Evaluation
Research Genres
The Discourse of Politics in Action
Appraising Research
Bringing in the Reader
Constructing proximity
Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles
Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice (Language Education)
An Introduction to Functional Grammar
Directives
Interaction in academic writing
Alignment, persuasiveness and the putative reader in opinion writing
The putative reader in mass media persuasion – stance, argumentation and ideology
Analysing Discourse
Obligation and reader involvement in English and Korean science popularizations
Discourse and diversionary justice
Honoris Causa speeches
Stance and engagement
New Discourse on Language
| Highly cited | No |
|---|