Digital evidence before the administrative courts in Jordan

This study explores the extent to which the Jordanian legislator uses digital evidence before the administrative courts and its legal bearing in protecting the rights of individuals when dealing with their use in administration. The paper concludes by discussing approaches to challenging the validity of digital evidence before the administrative judge. The absence of legislation on evidence in the administrative judiciary. This study adopts the descriptive analytical approach to analyse the legislative texts related to the subject, followed by comparing the Jordanian and Egyptian legislative systems to identify the strengths and weaknesses. This study found that the Jordanian and comparative legislation stipulates that the authoritativeness of digital documents has the same power as the authoritativeness of an ordinary written document in proof, provided that it is preserved from change and can be referred to at any time and that it identifies the person from whom it was issued

Business · E-Government · Information and Communications Technology · Political science · Artificial Intelligence in Law · Dispute Resolution and Class Actions · Law · Law, logistics, and international trade · Public Administration

• Administrative evidence without codification

  Open Access•Mohammed Abdul Mohsen Mohammed bin Treef, Mousa Sami Al-Qaaida et al.•Frontiers in Political Science•2026

  Add to list