Cultural capital as living heritage infrastructure
Rethinking heritage tourism in secondary cities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21785218 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Büşra Uzun (0000-0002-3391-0276, Atatürk University, corresponding author), Mehmet Zaman (0000-0002-1833-6501, Atatürk University), Kemal Üçüncü (0000-0002-6294-6112, Black Sea Commission), Omar Moufakkir (0000-0001-5660-3845, Gulf University for Science & Technology) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1-19 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Heritage Tourism (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1743-873X • E-ISSN: 1747-6631 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1743873x.2026.2694785 |
| OpenAlex | W7167585623 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 29 |
Heritage tourism research has largely framed cultural value through designation-driven and branding-oriented approaches that privilege globally visible destinations and capital cities, often overlooking secondary cities. This study aims to rethink how cultural capital is conceptualized and mobilized in heritage tourism, with a focus on Trabzon, a secondary city aspiring to become the Cultural Capital of the Turkic World. It develops a conceptual framework that reconceptualizes cultural capital as living heritage infrastructure – a relational and embedded process sustained through everyday practices, historical layering, and social relations. Methodologically, the study adopts a conceptual and interpretive approach, synthesizing insights from critical heritage studies, urban cultural theory, and tourism scholarship, and illustrating the framework through the case of Trabzon, Türkiye. The analysis demonstrates that cultural value does not depend solely on formal recognition or institutional visibility, but on how cultural life is sustained and aligned with local contexts. It also highlights the risks of commodification, simplification, and visibility-driven governance associated with designation-oriented approaches. The paper contributes a transferable conceptual lens for examining heritage tourism in secondary cities and advances an ethical approach to cultural capital leadership centered on stewardship, continuity, and community embeddedness, with both theoretical and practical implications
Cultural capital · Cultural heritage · Cultural heritage management · Cultural tourism · Heritage tourism · Industrial heritage · Social capital · Tourism · Tourism geography · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Heritage and Globalisation
The Tourist-Historic City
Cultural Heritage and Tourism
The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research
Uses of Heritage
Community Participation in Tourism at a World Heritage Site: Mutianyu Great Wall, Beijing, China
Cultural tourism
Heritage
Cultural Planning
Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration in Western European Cities
A typology of governance and its implications for tourism policy analysis
The Heritage Paradox
Creative Cities
Tourism and World Heritage in OECD Countries
The core of heritage tourism
Beyond Eurocentrism? Heritage conservation and the politics of difference
Creativity and tourism
Heritage diplomacy
The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |