Struggling to learn or learning to struggle? Student identity, anxiety, and academic integrity in AI-assisted writing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21785653 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Laurence L Delina (0000-0001-8637-4609, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, corresponding author), Aileen Del Rosario Rondilla (0009-0002-6015-3976, Chinese University of Hong Kong) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-17 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Learning Media and Technology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1743-9884 • E-ISSN: 1743-9892 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17439884.2026.2692945 |
| OpenAlex | W7166200900 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 53 |
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping academic writing and, in doing so, reframing how students understand integrity, authorship, and learning. Drawing on semi-structured focus groups with 58 undergraduates in two courses, this study examines students’ lived experiences of AI–assisted writing through a qualitative, practice–oriented lens. We develop a conceptual model in which perceived AI superiority, concerns about social judgment, and uncertainty about detection tools operate as antecedent conditions generating intellectual anxiety and identity disruption. These socioemotional dynamics shape ethical reasoning and authorship practices. Findings show that students engage with AI not as passive users or efficiency seekers but as active curators. They revise, reject, disclose, and reshape AI–generated text to preserve authorial voice, legitimacy, and ownership of learning. Academic integrity thus appears not as simple rule compliance or misconduct avoidance, but as an intentional, negotiated practice enacted through emotionally inflected judgment and contextual decision–making. Anxiety, self–doubt, and fear of misjudgement function as central mechanisms linking AI use to ethical engagement and student agency. Empirically, the study offers qualitative insight into how emotions, identity, and agency intersect in AI–assisted writing. Conceptually, it advances an integrity–as–practice framework and supports process–oriented assessment, engagement, and policy approaches beyond detection–centred or punitive models
Academic integrity · Academic writing · Educational technology · Electronic learning · Higher education · Qualitative research · Teaching method · Academic integrity and plagiarism · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities
A Meta-analysis of the Longitudinal Relationship Between Academic Self-Concept and Academic Achievement
Sample size for saturation in qualitative research
The mental health implications of artificial intelligence adoption
Humanising higher education through interdisciplinary student-devised assessments
Examining academic integrity policy and practice in the era of AI
How generative artificial intelligence transforms teaching and influences student wellbeing in future education
Can Artificial Intelligence Give a Hand to Open and Distributed Learning? A Probe into the State of Undergraduate Students’ Academic Emotions and Test Anxiety in Learning via ChatGPT
Who owns AI-generated artwork? Revisiting the work of generative AI based on human-AI co-creation
Unpacking help-seeking process through multimodal learning analytics
The Platformization of Writing Instruction
Academic self-concept, perceptions of the learning environment, engagement, and learning outcomes of university students
Contested affordances
Negotiating the authenticity of AI
A realist approach to thematic analysis
Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis
To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales
‘Where’s the line? It’s an absurd line’
The educational integrity enforcement pyramid
Artificial intelligence (AI) -integrated educational applications and college students’ creativity and academic emotions
From digital disruption to mental health
Enhancing the Taxonomies Relating to Academic Integrity and Misconduct
Using interview excerpts to facilitate focus group discussion
Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education
Let right be done
AI and Academic Integrity
When artificial intelligence substitutes humans in higher education
Academic Integrity as a Teaching & Learning Issue
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |